Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37514454›Full record

ArticlePolymers2023

Overview and Comparison of PLA Filaments Commercially Available in Europe for FFF Technology.

Vladislav Andronov, Libor Beránek, Vojtěch Krůta, Lucie Hlavůňková, Zdeňka Jeníková

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vladislav AndronovDepartment of Machining, Process Planning and Metrology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, The Czech Technical University in Prague, 160 00 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-9545-3624
Libor BeránekDepartment of Machining, Process Planning and Metrology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, The Czech Technical University in Prague, 160 00 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-3190-2405
Vojtěch KrůtaDepartment of Machining, Process Planning and Metrology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, The Czech Technical University in Prague, 160 00 Prague, Czech Republic.
Lucie HlavůňkováDepartment of Machining, Process Planning and Metrology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, The Czech Technical University in Prague, 160 00 Prague, Czech Republic.
Zdeňka JeníkováDepartment of Materials Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, The Czech Technical University in Prague, 160 00 Prague, Czech Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study presents a comprehensive techno-economic analysis of PLA materials for fused filament fabrication (FFF) from eight European manufacturers. The comparison involved rigorous experimental assessments of the mechanical properties, dimensional accuracy, and print quality using standardized methods and equipment such as tensile and CT testing. What makes this study unique is the consistent methodology applied, considering factors such as material color, printing temperature, printing orientation, filament diameter, and printer selection, to ensure meaningful and reliable results. Contrary to the common belief that a higher price implies better quality, the study revealed that the second cheapest PLA material achieved the best overall performance within the methodology employed. The study also confirmed certain observations, such as the influence of printing orientation and geometry on dimensional accuracy and mechanical properties, as well as the significant disparities between manufacturer-provided values and actual measured mechanical properties, highlighting the importance of experimental verification. Hence, the findings of this study hold value not only for the scientific community but also for hobbyist printers and beginners in the 3D printing realm seeking guidance in material selection for their projects. Furthermore, the methodology employed in this research can be adapted for evaluating a broad range of other 3D printing materials.

Indexed as

3D printingadditive manufacturingFDMFFFfilament comparisonPLA

Identifiers

PMID37514454
PMCPMC10386515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.