ArticlePolymers2023
Feasibility of 3D-Printed Locking Compression Plates with Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK) in Tibial Comminuted Diaphyseal Fractures.
Article in Polymers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Network Toxicology and Molecular Docking Analysis of Targets and Potential Mechanisms of PEEK-Induced Bone Resorption.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Personalised 3D-printed bioactive peek bone plate scaffold for treating femoral defects.RSC advances · 2025Article
- Advanced FFF of PEEK: Infill Strategies and Material Characteristics for Rapid Tooling.Polymers · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The applicability of a polyether ether ketone locking compression plate (PEEK LCP) fabricated using FDM (fused deposition modeling)-based 3D printing to treat actual patients was studied. Three different tests-bending, axial compression, and axial torsion-were conducted on tibial non-osteoporotic comminuted diaphyseal fracture samples fixed with the commercial titanium alloy LCP and 3D-printed PEEK LCP. Comparing the outcomes of these tests revealed that the commercial titanium alloy LCP underwent plastic deformation in the bending and axial torsion tests, though the LCP did not fail even when an external force greater than the maximum allowable load of the tibia fixture of the LCP was applied. Elastic deformation occurred in the 3D-printed PEEK LCP in the bending and axial torsion tests. However, deformation occurred even under a small external force, and its stiffness was 10% compared to commercial titanium alloy LCP. Thus, 3D-printed PEEK LCP can be applied to the fracture conditions in non-weight-bearing regions. The experimental results reveal detailed insights into the treatment of actual patients by considering the stiffness and high toughness of 3D-printed PEEK LCP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.