ArticlePolymers2023
Trueness, Flexural Strength, and Surface Properties of Various Three-Dimensional (3D) Printed Interim Restorative Materials after Accelerated Aging.
Article in Polymers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effect of different 3D-printing systems on the flexural strength of provisional fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of in vitro studies.BMC oral health · 2025Pooled it
- The flexural strength of 3D-printed provisional restorations fabricated with different resins: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC oral health · 2024Pooled it
- Effect of Different Polishing Systems on the Surface Roughness of 3D-Printed Resins.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- 3D printing vs. conventional wax patterns: a comparative in vitro study on retention of RPD framework.Odontology · 2026Article
- Effects of high temperature with pressure post-treatment on the Vickers hardness, color stability, and translucency of 3D-printed denture teeth resin under thermocycling conditions.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- 3D-Printed Versus Conventional Dental Provisional Resins: A Comparative Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Comparison of the Bond Strength to Titanium of Resin-Based Materials Fabricated by Additive and Subtractive Manufacturing Methods.Polymers · 2025Article
- Impact of Autoclaving on the Material Properties of Vat-Photopolymerization-Produced Components Intended for Bioprocess Engineering.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Effects of silica particle size on the mechanical, surface and printing-trueness properties of 3D-printing dental resin.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Accuracy and fitness of digital light processing-fabricated resin-based permanent crowns after thermal aging.Journal of dental sciences · 2025Article
- The Impact of Additive and Subtractive Manufacturing on the Adhesion and Durability of Titanium-Zirconia Restorative Materials.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Comparison of mechanical properties of different 3D printing technologies.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Flexural Strength, Fatigue Behavior, and Microhardness of Three-Dimensional (3D)-Printed Resin Material for Indirect Restorations: A Systematic Review.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Influence of 3D printing system, postpolymerization and aging protocols on resin flexural strength and dimensional stability for printing occlusal splints, models and temporary restorations.Clinical oral investigations · 2024Article
- A Novel 3-Dimensional Printed Nanoceramic Hybrid Resin Fixed Lingual Retainer: Characterization and Mechanical Tests.International journal of dentistry · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Various 3D printing systems for interim fixed dental restorations are commercially available. This study aimed to evaluate the physical and mechanical properties of 3D printed resins used for interim restorations fabricated using various 3D printing systems and printing angulations after accelerated aging. Three different interim restorative materials were provided and printed using their specific 3D printing systems (A: NextDent; B: Asiga; C: Nova3D), and the testing specimens from each system were printed at two building angles: (1) 0° and (2) 90°. The six groups were A1, A2, B1, B2, C1, and C2, with sixteen specimens per group. Half of the specimens in each group (N = 8) were subjected to accelerated aging, including simulated brushing and thermocycling. Three-point bending, surface roughness, and Vickers microhardness tests were performed. Two-way ANOVA and Fisher's multiple tests were used for statistical analyses. The most accurate systems were found in groups C1 and C2 for length, A1 and B1 for width, and A1 and C1 for height. The specimen trueness only changed after aging for groups B1, B2, and C1. The flexural strength of the A2 group (151 ± 7 MPa) before aging was higher than that of the other groups, and the strength decreased after aging only for groups A1 and A2. The flexural strength, microhardness, and surface roughness of the 3D printed interim resins after aging varied depending on the material, system used, and printing angle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.