Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37514282›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Weed-Hoeing Periods in Cowpea Cultivation under Direct and Conventional Systems.

Eudinete Ribeiro de Sousa, Larissa de Oliveira Fontes, José Hamilton da Costa Filho, Antonio Leandro Chaves Gurgel, Wéverson Lima Fonseca, Alan Mario Zuffo, Daniele Galvão Alencar, Tairon Pannunzio Dias E Silva, Julian Junio de Jesús Lacerda, Jorge González Aguilera and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 96% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Eudinete Ribeiro de SousaDepartment of Agronomy, Universidade Federal do Piauí, Bom Jesus 64915-000, PI, Brazil.
Larissa de Oliveira FontesDepartment of Agronomy, Universidade Federal do Piauí, Bom Jesus 64915-000, PI, Brazil.
José Hamilton da Costa FilhoDepartment of Agronomy, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Macaíba 59280-000, RN, Brazil.
Antonio Leandro Chaves GurgelDepartment of Zootechnics, Universidade Federal do Piauí, Bom Jesus 64915-000, PI, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5911-369X
Wéverson Lima FonsecaDepartment of Agronomy, Universidade Federal do Piauí, Bom Jesus 64915-000, PI, Brazil.
Alan Mario ZuffoDepartment of Agronomy, State University of Maranhão, Balsas 65800-000, MA, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9704-5325
Daniele Galvão AlencarDepartment of Agronomy, Universidade Federal do Piauí, Bom Jesus 64915-000, PI, Brazil.
Tairon Pannunzio Dias E SilvaDepartment of Zootechnics, Universidade Federal do Piauí, Bom Jesus 64915-000, PI, Brazil.
Julian Junio de Jesús LacerdaDepartment of Agronomy, Universidade Federal do Piauí, Bom Jesus 64915-000, PI, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9452-2453
Jorge González AguileraDepartment of Crop Science, State University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Cassilândia 79540-000, MS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7308-0967
José Antonio Rodríguez GarcíaEscuela Profesional de Ingeniería Ambiental, Universidad Nacional de Moquegua (UNAM), Ilo 18601, Peru.
Renatto Nicolino Motta ZevallosNational Intercultural University of Quillabamba, La Convenciòn, Cusco 084-282728, Peru.ORCID 0000-0002-2730-5571
Luis Morales-AranibarNational Intercultural University of Quillabamba, La Convenciòn, Cusco 084-282728, Peru.ORCID 0000-0002-9421-9833
Alfredo Modesto Marcavillaca LunaNational Intercultural University of Quillabamba, La Convenciòn, Cusco 084-282728, Peru.ORCID 0000-0002-4736-4042
Hebert Hernán Soto GonzalesEscuela Profesional de Ingeniería Ambiental, Universidad Nacional de Moquegua (UNAM), Ilo 18601, Peru.ORCID 0000-0002-9936-1943
Universidade Federal do Piauí · BRUniversidad Nacional Intercultural de QuillabambaUniversidad Nacional de Moquegua · PEUniversidade Estadual de Mato Grosso do Sul · BRUniversidade Estadual do Maranhão · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Weed coexistence with an agricultural crop can negatively affect its growth, development, and yield. From this perspective, this study aimed to evaluate weed management strategies and their effect on the agronomic parameters of cowpea cultivation in direct (SPD) and conventional (SPC) planting systems. The experiment was set up in a completely randomized block design with a split-plot arrangement with four replications. The plots received a source of variation referring to the planting systems (direct and conventional planting), and the subplots corresponded to ten weed management strategies (manual hoeing 18 days after planting (DAP); at 36 DAP; at 54 DAP; at 18 and 36 DAP; at 18 and 54 DAP; at 18 and 72 DAP; at 36 and 54 DAP; at 36-72 DAP; at 18, 36, and 54 DAP; and a control with no hoeing). Density and dry mass evaluations of the cowpea plants were performed at harvest (72 DAP) by determining the number of pods per plant, pod length, number of grains per pod, 1000-grain mass, and yield. A total of 28 species distributed in 12 botanical families were identified in the two cultivation systems. The family

Indexed as

competitioninterferencemechanical controlVigna unguiculatayield

Identifiers

PMID37514282
PMCPMC10385808
OpenAlexW4384694528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.