Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37514205›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Screening

Michelle J G Alves, Johny Jesus Mendonça, Gisely Moreira Vitalino, José Paula Oliveira, Erix Xavier Carvalho, Felipe José Cury Fracetto, Giselle Gomes Monteiro Fracetto, Mario Andrade Lira Junior

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Michelle J G AlvesDepartamento de Agronomia, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Recife 52171-900, Brazil.
Johny Jesus MendonçaDepartamento de Agronomia, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Recife 52171-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7690-6234
Gisely Moreira VitalinoDepartamento de Agronomia, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Recife 52171-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6905-5603
José Paula OliveiraInstituto Agronômico de Pernambuco, Recife 50171-000, Brazil.
Erix Xavier CarvalhoInstituto Agronômico de Pernambuco, Recife 50171-000, Brazil.
Felipe José Cury FracettoDepartamento de Agronomia, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Recife 52171-900, Brazil.
Giselle Gomes Monteiro FracettoDepartamento de Agronomia, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Recife 52171-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9366-2588
Mario Andrade Lira JuniorDepartamento de Agronomia, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Recife 52171-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7779-3369

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior Finance Code 001Fundação de Amparo à Ciência e Tecnologia de Pernambuco BCT-0406-5.03/21, APQ-0453-5.01/15 and BPV-0008-5.01/19National Council for Scientific and Technological Development 304107/2020-4, 306252/2021-0, 401896/2013-7 and 483287/2013-0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The search for sustainable agriculture has increased interest in using endophytic bacteria to reduce fertilizer use and increase stress resilience. Stress-adapted plants are a potential source of these bacteria. Some species of these plants have not yet been evaluated for this, such as pangolão grass, from which we considered endophytic bacteria as potential plant growth promoters. Bacteria from the root, colm, leaves, and rhizospheric soil were isolated, and 132 strains were evaluated for their in vitro biological nitrogen fixation, IAA and siderophores production, and phosphate solubilization. Each mechanism was also assessed under low N availability, water stress, and low-solubility Fe and P sources in maize greenhouse experiments. All strains synthesized IAA; 63 grew on N-free media, 114 synthesized siderophores, and 46 solubilized P, while 19 presented all four mechanisms. Overall, these strains had better performance than commercial inoculant in all experiments. Still, in vitro responses were not good predictors of in vivo effects, which indicates that the former should not be used for strain selection, since this could lead to not testing strains with good plant growth promotion potential. Their heterologous growth promotion in maize reinforces the potential of stress-adapted plant species as potential sources of strains for inoculants.

Indexed as

biological nitrogen fixationIAAphosphorus solubilizationplant growthsiderophores

Identifiers

PMID37514205
PMCPMC10385894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.