Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37514166›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutics2023

What We Learned about the Feasibility of Gene Electrotransfer for Vaccination on a Model of COVID-19 Vaccine.

Urska Kamensek, Maja Cemazar, Simona Kranjc Brezar, Tanja Jesenko, Spela Kos, Katarina Znidar, Bostjan Markelc, Ziva Modic, Tilen Komel, Tim Gorse and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Urska KamensekInstitute of Oncology Ljubljana, Zaloska Cesta 2, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-0481-4226
Maja CemazarInstitute of Oncology Ljubljana, Zaloska Cesta 2, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-1418-1928
Simona Kranjc BrezarInstitute of Oncology Ljubljana, Zaloska Cesta 2, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Tanja JesenkoInstitute of Oncology Ljubljana, Zaloska Cesta 2, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0001-5883-1673
Spela KosInstitute of Oncology Ljubljana, Zaloska Cesta 2, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Katarina ZnidarInstitute of Oncology Ljubljana, Zaloska Cesta 2, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Bostjan MarkelcInstitute of Oncology Ljubljana, Zaloska Cesta 2, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-8674-702X
Ziva ModicInstitute of Oncology Ljubljana, Zaloska Cesta 2, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0001-8202-6463
Tilen KomelInstitute of Oncology Ljubljana, Zaloska Cesta 2, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Tim GorseBiotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Jamnikarjeva Ulica 101, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Eva RebersekBiotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Jamnikarjeva Ulica 101, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Helena JakopicBiotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Jamnikarjeva Ulica 101, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Gregor SersaInstitute of Oncology Ljubljana, Zaloska Cesta 2, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-7641-5670
University of Ljubljana · SIInstitute of Oncology Ljubljana · SIUniversity of Primorska · SI

Funding

Slovenian Research Agency P3-0003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA vaccination is one of the emerging approaches for a wide range of applications, including prophylactic vaccination against infectious diseases and therapeutic vaccination against cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of our previously optimized protocols for gene electrotransfer (GET)-mediated delivery of plasmid DNA into skin and muscle tissues on a model of COVID-19 vaccine. Plasmids encoding the SARS-CoV-2 proteins spike (S) and nucleocapsid (N) were used as the antigen source, and a plasmid encoding interleukin 12 (IL-12) was used as an adjuvant. Vaccination was performed in the skin or muscle tissue of C57BL/6J mice on days 0 and 14 (boost). Two weeks after the boost, blood, spleen, and transfected tissues were collected to determine the expression of S, N, IL-12, serum interferon-γ, the induction of antigen-specific IgG antibodies, and cytotoxic T-cells. In accordance with prior in vitro experiments that indicated problems with proper expression of the S protein, vaccination with S did not induce S-specific antibodies, whereas significant induction of N-specific antibodies was detected after vaccination with N. Intramuscular vaccination outperformed skin vaccination and resulted in significant induction of humoral and cell-mediated immunity. Moreover, both boost and adjuvant were found to be redundant for the induction of an immune response. Overall, the study confirmed the feasibility of the GET for DNA vaccination and provided valuable insights into this approach.

Indexed as

COVID-19 vaccineDNA vaccinationgene electrotransferimmunological adjuvantinterleukin 12

Identifiers

PMID37514166
PMCPMC10385748
OpenAlexW4384829367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.