Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37512562›Full record

ReviewMetabolites2023

Integrating Omics Data in Genome-Scale Metabolic Modeling: A Methodological Perspective for Precision Medicine.

Partho Sen, Matej Orešič

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Metabolites, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Longitudinal big biological data in the AI era.Molecular systems biology · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. COmmunity and Single Microbe Optimisation System (COSMOS).NPJ systems biology and applications · 2025
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Partho SenTurku Bioscience Centre, University of Turku and Åbo Akademi University, FI-20520 Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-0475-2763
Matej OrešičTurku Bioscience Centre, University of Turku and Åbo Akademi University, FI-20520 Turku, Finland.

Funding

Horizon Europe Program of the European Union 01094099Research Council of Finland 333981
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advancements in omics technologies have generated a wealth of biological data. Integrating these data within mathematical models is essential to fully leverage their potential. Genome-scale metabolic models (GEMs) provide a robust framework for studying complex biological systems. GEMs have significantly contributed to our understanding of human metabolism, including the intrinsic relationship between the gut microbiome and the host metabolism. In this review, we highlight the contributions of GEMs and discuss the critical challenges that must be overcome to ensure their reproducibility and enhance their prediction accuracy, particularly in the context of precision medicine. We also explore the role of machine learning in addressing these challenges within GEMs. The integration of omics data with GEMs has the potential to lead to new insights, and to advance our understanding of molecular mechanisms in human health and disease.

Indexed as

constraint-based modelinghost microbiomehuman metabolic networkshuman metabolismmetabolic modelingmetabolic reconstructionsmulti-omics

Identifiers

PMID37512562
PMCPMC10383060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.