ArticleMetabolites2023
Quantitative Analytical and Computational Workflow for Large-Scale Targeted Plasma Metabolomics.
Article in Metabolites, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Dysregulated Metabolism in People Living With HIV in the Modern ART-Era: A Systematic Review of Targeted Metabolomics Studies.Reviews in medical virology · 2026Pooled it
- Emerging Quantitative Targeted Metabolomics Approaches for Future Inborn Errors of Metabolism Screening.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Myopia and Metabolomics: A Comparative Study of Aqueous Humor and Serum Metabolites in Myopic Adults Undergoing Cataract Surgery.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- EMBL-MCF 2.0: an LC-MS/MS method and corresponding library for high-confidence targeted and untargeted metabolomics using low-adsorption HILIC chromatography.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Quantifying metabolites from various biological samples is necessary for the clinical and biomedical translation of metabolomics research. One of the ongoing challenges in biomedical metabolomics studies is the large-scale quantification of targeted metabolites, mainly due to the complexity of biological sample matrices. Furthermore, in LC-MS analysis, the response of compounds is influenced by their physicochemical properties, chromatographic conditions, eluent composition, sample preparation, type of MS ionization source, and analyzer used. To facilitate large-scale metabolite quantification, we evaluated the relative response factor (RRF) approach combined with an integrated analytical and computational workflow. This approach considers a compound's individual response in LC-MS analysis relative to that of a non-endogenous reference compound to correct matrix effects. We created a quantitative LC-MS library using the Skyline/Panorama web platform for data processing and public sharing of data. In this study, we developed and validated a metabolomics method for over 280 standard metabolites and quantified over 90 metabolites. The RRF quantification was validated and compared with conventional external calibration approaches as well as literature reports. The Skyline software environment was adapted for processing such metabolomics data, and the results are shared as a "quantitative chromatogram library" with the Panorama web application. This new workflow was found to be suitable for large-scale quantification of metabolites in human plasma samples. In conclusion, we report a novel quantitative chromatogram library with a targeted data analysis workflow for biomedical metabolomic applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.