Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37512107›Full record

ReviewMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2023

Comparison of Wire and Non-Wire Localisation Techniques in Breast Cancer Surgery: A Review of the Literature with Pooled Analysis.

Shahram Shirazi, Hamed Hajiesmaeili, Muskaan Khosla, Saima Taj, Tapan Sircar, Raghavan Vidya

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. OneMark™ breast localisation: integrating diagnosis and surgical guidance-a narrative review.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Evolution of localization methods for non-palpable breast lesions: a literature review from a translational medicine perspective.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shahram ShiraziSpecialist Registrar in Breast Surgery, Princess Royal University Hospital, Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London SE5 9RS, UK.
Hamed HajiesmaeiliSpecialist Registrar in Breast Surgery, Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton WV10 0QP, UK.
Muskaan KhoslaSenior Clinical Fellow in Breast Surgery, Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton WV10 0QP, UK.
Saima TajSenior Clinical Fellow in Breast Surgery, Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton WV10 0QP, UK.
Tapan SircarConsultant in Oncoplastic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery, Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton WV10 0QP, UK.
Raghavan VidyaConsultant in Oncoplastic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery, Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton WV10 0QP, UK.
The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust · GBPrincess Royal University Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsBreastFemaleHumansMargins of ExcisionMastectomy, SegmentalReoperationbreast cancerlocalisationlocalizationMagseednon-palpable breast lumppositive marginsre-excisionROLLRSLSAVI SCOUTWGLwire-freewire-guided

Identifiers

PMID37512107
PMCPMC10383802
OpenAlexW4384298119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.