ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Surgical Treatments for Women with Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Systematic Review.
Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fractional COInternational urogynecology journal · 2026Article
- Construction and Validation of a Nomogram for Diagnosis of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence Combined with Anatomic/Intrinsic Urethral Sphincter Deficiency.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Micturition Control with Activation of EUS Nerves at the Spinal Cord Using Fiber Optic Stimulation.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Comparison of the Long-term Treatment Outcome Between Pubovaginal and Transobturator Suburethral Sling for Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women.International neurourology journal · 2025Article
- Pelvic Organ Prolapse-Health-Preserving Attitudes According to Sociodemographic Factors.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Effect of High-Intensity Focused Electromagnetic Technology in the Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- Management of Stress Urinary Incontinence by Obstetricians and Gynecologists in Jordan: A Nationwide Survey Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stress urinary incontinence affects a large proportion of women in their lifetime. The objective of this review was to describe and compare the latest surgical trends in urinary incontinence and focus on the literature advantages, disadvantages, complications and efficacy of surgical procedures regarding this pathology. Using network meta-analysis, we have identified the most frequently used procedures (Burch surgery, midurethral sling and pubovaginal sling), and we have described and characterized them in terms of effectiveness and safety. Midurethral procedures remain the gold standard for surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence, although the potential of serious complications following this procedure should be taken into consideration always. There is a clear need for a much more unified evaluation of possible complications and postoperative evolution. This process will help practitioners to adapt and individualize their strategy for each patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.