Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37511816›Full record

ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Artificial Intelligence for Classifying the Relationship between Impacted Third Molar and Mandibular Canal on Panoramic Radiographs.

Antonio Lo Casto, Giacomo Spartivento, Viviana Benfante, Riccardo Di Raimondo, Muhammad Ali, Domenico Di Raimondo, Antonino Tuttolomondo, Alessandro Stefano, Anthony Yezzi, Albert Comelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Indirect-Oscillation Sign Suggesting Infective Endocarditis on the Routine Chest CT.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Antonio Lo CastoSection of Radiological Sciences, Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy.
Giacomo SpartiventoSection of Radiological Sciences, Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy.
Viviana BenfanteRi.MED Foundation, Via Bandiera 11, 90133 Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3629-355X
Riccardo Di RaimondoPostgraduate Section of Periodontology, Faculty of Odontology, University Complutense, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Muhammad AliRi.MED Foundation, Via Bandiera 11, 90133 Palermo, Italy.
Domenico Di RaimondoDepartment of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4529-3703
Antonino TuttolomondoDepartment of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6440-7318
Alessandro StefanoInstitute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology, National Research Council (IBFM-CNR), 90015 Cefalù, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7189-1731
Anthony YezziDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.
Albert ComelliRi.MED Foundation, Via Bandiera 11, 90133 Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9290-6103

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of two convolutional neural networks (CNNs), namely ResNet-152 and VGG-19, in analyzing, on panoramic images, the rapport that exists between the lower third molar (MM3) and the mandibular canal (MC), and to compare this performance with that of an inexperienced observer (a sixth year dental student). Utilizing the k-fold cross-validation technique, 142 MM3 images, cropped from 83 panoramic images, were split into 80% as training and validation data and 20% as test data. They were subsequently labeled by an experienced radiologist as the gold standard. In order to compare the diagnostic capabilities of CNN algorithms and the inexperienced observer, the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) were determined. ResNet-152 achieved a mean sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and accuracy, of 84.09%, 94.11%, 92.11%, and 88.86%, respectively. VGG-19 achieved 71.82%, 93.33%, 92.26%, and 85.28% regarding the aforementioned characteristics. The dental student's diagnostic performance was respectively 69.60%, 53.00%, 64.85%, and 62.53%. This work demonstrated the potential use of deep CNN architecture for the identification and evaluation of the contact between MM3 and MC in panoramic pictures. In addition, CNNs could be a useful tool to assist inexperienced observers in more accurately identifying contact relationships between MM3 and MC on panoramic images.

Indexed as

contact relationshipconvolutional neural networkinferior alveolar nervemandibular third molarpanoramic radiographResNet-152VGG-19

Identifiers

PMID37511816
PMCPMC10381483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.