Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37511800›Full record

ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Promising High-Tech Devices in Dry Eye Disease Diagnosis.

Andrea De Luca, Alessandro Ferraro, Chiara De Gregorio, Mariateresa Laborante, Marco Coassin, Roberto Sgrulletta, Antonio Di Zazzo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Repeatability and Reproducibility of the Dry Eye Analyzer in Participants With and Without Symptoms of Dry Eye.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Article
  2. Unveiling dry eye disease prior to cataract surgery: A multicenter clinical study.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Diagnostic methods for managing dry eyes.World journal of methodology · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. A Novel Noninvasive Screening Tool for Dry Eye Disease.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andrea De LucaOphthalmology Complex Operative Unit, University Campus Bio-Medico, 00128 Rome, Italy.
Alessandro FerraroOphthalmology Complex Operative Unit, University Campus Bio-Medico, 00128 Rome, Italy.
Chiara De GregorioOphthalmology Complex Operative Unit, University Campus Bio-Medico, 00128 Rome, Italy.
Mariateresa LaboranteOphthalmology Complex Operative Unit, University Campus Bio-Medico, 00128 Rome, Italy.
Marco CoassinOphthalmology Complex Operative Unit, University Campus Bio-Medico, 00128 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3404-0425
Roberto SgrullettaOphthalmology Complex Operative Unit, University Campus Bio-Medico, 00128 Rome, Italy.
Antonio Di ZazzoOphthalmology Complex Operative Unit, University Campus Bio-Medico, 00128 Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDry eye disease (DED) is a common and debilitating condition that affects millions of people worldwide. Despite its prevalence, the diagnosis and management of DED can be challenging, as the condition is multifactorial and symptoms can be nonspecific. In recent years, there have been significant advancements in diagnostic technology for DED, including the development of several new devices.

methodsA literature review of articles on the dry eye syndrome and innovative diagnostic devices was carried out to provide an overview of some of the current high-tech diagnostic tools for DED, specifically focusing on the TearLab Osmolarity System, DEvice Hygrometer, IDRA, Tearcheck, Keratograph 5M, Cornea Dome Lens Imaging System, I-PEN Osmolarity System, LipiView II interferometer, LacryDiag Ocular Surface Analyzer, Tearscope-Plus, and Cobra HD Camera.

conclusionsDespite the fact that consistent use of these tools in clinical settings could facilitate diagnosis, no diagnostic device can replace the TFOS algorithm.

Indexed as

diagnostic devicedry eye diseaseocular surface

Identifiers

PMID37511800
PMCPMC10381352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.