Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37511382›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

Neurofilament-Light, a Promising Biomarker: Analytical, Metrological and Clinical Challenges.

Salomé Coppens, Sylvain Lehmann, Christopher Hopley, Christophe Hirtz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Neurofilament Light Chains in Systemic Amyloidosis: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Exercise Training and Biomarkers of Neuroaxonal Injury in Multiple Sclerosis: Narrative Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Salomé CoppensNational Measurement Laboratory, LGC Limited, Teddington TW11 0LY, UK.
Sylvain LehmannUniv. Montpellier, IRMB-PPC, INM, CHU Montpellier, INSERM CNRS, 34295 Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6117-562X
Christopher HopleyNational Measurement Laboratory, LGC Limited, Teddington TW11 0LY, UK.
Christophe HirtzUniv. Montpellier, IRMB-PPC, INM, CHU Montpellier, INSERM CNRS, 34295 Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7313-0629

Funding

European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program Marie Curie ITN 'MIRIADE' 860303
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurofilament-light chain (Nf-L) is a non-specific early-stage biomarker widely studied in the context of neurodegenerative diseases (NDD) and traumatic brain injuries (TBI), which can be measured in biofluids after axonal damage. Originally measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), Nf-L can now be quantified in blood with the emergence of ultrasensitive assays. However, to ensure successful clinical implementation, reliable clinical thresholds and reference measurement procedures (RMP) should be developed. This includes establishing and distributing certified reference materials (CRM). As a result of the complexity of Nf-L and the number of circulating forms, a clear definition of what is measured when immunoassays are used is also critical to achieving standardization to ensure the long-term success of those assays. The use of powerful tools such as mass spectrometry for developing RMP and defining the measurand is ongoing. Here, we summarize the current methods in use for quantification of Nf-L in biofluid showing potential for clinical implementation. The progress and challenges in developing RMP and defining the measurand for Nf-L standardization of diagnostic tests are addressed. Finally, we discuss the impact of pathophysiological factors on Nf-L levels and the establishment of a clinical cut-off.

Indexed as

AxonsIntermediate FilamentsBiomarkersEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayImmunoassayNeurofilament ProteinsBiomarkersNeurofilament Proteinsbiomarkerimplementationneurodegenerative diseaseneurofilament-lightstandardization

Identifiers

PMID37511382
PMCPMC10380627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.