Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37510964›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023

Validity of the Central Sensitization Inventory to Address Human Assumed Central Sensitization: Newly Proposed Clinically Relevant Values and Associations.

Ingrid Schuttert, André P Wolff, Rita H R Schiphorst Preuper, Alec G G A Malmberg, Michiel F Reneman, Hans Timmerman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Central sensitization-related symptoms in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery: development and internal validation of a clinical prediction rule for first-stage screening.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Quadratus lumborum muscle stiffness in chronic non-specific low back pain: a diagnostic accuracy study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ingrid SchuttertPain Center, Department of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), University of Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2164-4721
André P WolffPain Center, Department of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), University of Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.
Rita H R Schiphorst PreuperDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), University of Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.
Alec G G A MalmbergDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), University of Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.
Michiel F RenemanDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), University of Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.
Hans TimmermanPain Center, Department of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), University of Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6082-9043
University Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Central sensitization cannot be directly demonstrated in humans and thus a gold standard is missing. Therefore, we used human assumed central sensitization (HACS) when associated with humans. The central sensitization inventory (CSI) is a screening questionnaire for addressing symptoms that are associated with HACS. This cross-sectional study compared patients with chronic pain and at least one central sensitivity syndrome with healthy, pain-free controls via ROC analyses. Analyses were performed for all participants together and for each sex separately. Regression analyses were performed on patients with chronic pain with and without central sensitivity syndromes. Based on 1730 patients and 250 healthy controls, cutoff values for the CSI for the total group were established at 30 points: women: 33 points; men: 25 points. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to identify possible predictors for the CSI score in 2890 patients with chronic pain. The CSI score is associated with all independent factors and has a low association with pain severity in women and a low association with pain severity, age, and body mass index in men. The newly established CSI cutoff values are lower than in previous studies and different per sex, which might be of clinical relevance in daily practice and importance in research.

Indexed as

central sensitivity syndrome (CSS)central sensitization (CS)central sensitization inventory (CSI)chronic paincutoff valuehuman assumed central sensitization (HACS)sensitivitysensitizationspecificityvalidity

Identifiers

PMID37510964
PMCPMC10381378
OpenAlexW4385213235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.