ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2023
Redo-TAVR: Essential Concepts, Updated Data and Current Gaps in Evidence.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reintervention for Failed Aortic Bioprostheses: Distinct Patient Profiles for Redo Surgery and Valve-in-Valve TAVR in an All-Comers Cohort.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Redo-Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (Redo-TAVI)-Pilot Study from Multicentre Nationwide Registry.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Young Patients: Challenges and Perspectives-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Pharmacology in Structural Intervention for Valvular Heart Disease: Current Practice and Future Perspectives.Structural heart : the journal of the Heart Team · 2025Review
- The future direction of post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement reinterventions: insights from the Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry.Annals of cardiothoracic surgery · 2025Article
- CT imaging post-TAVI: Murphy's first law in action-preparing to recognize the unexpected.Insights into imaging · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Within the last two decades, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has transformed the treatment strategy for symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS), representing a less invasive alternative to traditional open-chest surgery. With time, advances in device features, imaging planning, and implantation techniques have contributed to an improvement in safety as well as a reduction in procedural complications. This has led to the expansion of TAVR to lower-risk patients, where TAVR has shown favorable outcomes compared to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). As TAVR expands to younger and lower-risk patients with longer life expectancies, the need for reintervention for failing transcatheter heart valves is expected to increase. Redo-TAVR has gained increasing relevance in the lifetime management of AS as one of the treatment strategies available for structural valve dysfunction (SVD). However, some issues are associated with this approach, including coronary re-access and the risk of coronary obstruction. In this review, we provide essential concepts to properly select candidates for Redo-TAVR, updated data on clinical outcomes and complication rates, and current gaps in evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.