Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37510889›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2023

Latest Developments in Adapting Deep Learning for Assessing TAVR Procedures and Outcomes.

Anas M Tahir, Onur Mutlu, Faycal Bensaali, Rabab Ward, Abdel Naser Ghareeb, Sherif M H A Helmy, Khaled T Othman, Mohammed A Al-Hashemi, Salem Abujalala, Muhammad E H Chowdhury and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Anas M TahirElectrical and Computer Engineering Department, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5018-0626
Onur MutluBiomedical Research Center, Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar.
Faycal BensaaliDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0002-9273-4735
Rabab WardElectrical and Computer Engineering Department, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2471-1902
Abdel Naser GhareebHeart Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha 3050, Qatar.
Sherif M H A HelmyNoninvasive Cardiology Section, Cardiology Department, Heart Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha 3050, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0002-2320-3041
Khaled T OthmanHeart Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha 3050, Qatar.
Mohammed A Al-HashemiNoninvasive Cardiology Section, Cardiology Department, Heart Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha 3050, Qatar.
Salem AbujalalaHeart Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha 3050, Qatar.
Muhammad E H ChowdhuryDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0003-0744-8206
A Rahman D M H AlnabtiHeart Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha 3050, Qatar.
Huseyin C YalcinBiomedical Research Center, Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0003-3825-9934
Hamad Medical Corporation · QAQatar University · QAUniversity of British Columbia · CAAl-Azhar University · EG

Funding

Qatar National Research Fund NPRP13S-0108-200024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aortic valve defects are among the most prevalent clinical conditions. A severely damaged or non-functioning aortic valve is commonly replaced with a bioprosthetic heart valve (BHV) via the transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) procedure. Accurate pre-operative planning is crucial for a successful TAVR outcome. Assessment of computational fluid dynamics (CFD), finite element analysis (FEA), and fluid-solid interaction (FSI) analysis offer a solution that has been increasingly utilized to evaluate BHV mechanics and dynamics. However, the high computational costs and the complex operation of computational modeling hinder its application. Recent advancements in the deep learning (DL) domain can offer a real-time surrogate that can render hemodynamic parameters in a few seconds, thus guiding clinicians to select the optimal treatment option. Herein, we provide a comprehensive review of classical computational modeling approaches, medical imaging, and DL approaches for planning and outcome assessment of TAVR. Particularly, we focus on DL approaches in previous studies, highlighting the utilized datasets, deployed DL models, and achieved results. We emphasize the critical challenges and recommend several future directions for innovative researchers to tackle. Finally, an end-to-end smart DL framework is outlined for real-time assessment and recommendation of the best BHV design for TAVR. Ultimately, deploying such a framework in future studies will support clinicians in minimizing risks during TAVR therapy planning and will help in improving patient care.

Indexed as

cardiovascular hemodynamicscomputational modelingdeep learninggraph convolutional networktranscatheter aortic valve implantationtranscatheter aortic valve replacement

Identifiers

PMID37510889
PMCPMC10381346
OpenAlexW4384780017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.