ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2023
JAK Inhibition in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA): Better Understanding of a Promising Therapy for Refractory Cases.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- PAFLAR guidelines for oligoarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis.Clinical rheumatology · 2026Guideline
- Pediatric Society of the African League Against Rheumatism juvenile idiopathic arthritis recommendations for enthesitis-related arthritis and juvenile psoriatic arthritis.Clinical rheumatology · 2025Guideline
- Review
- Therapeutic efficacy of upadacitinib in refractory juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a case report.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib treatment in Finnish patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a real-life study.Arthritis research & therapy · 2025Article
- The emerging role of neutrophil extracellular traps in autoimmune and autoinflammatory diseases.MedComm · 2025Review
- Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of the JAK Inhibitors and Biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in Treating Children With Nonsystemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Bayesian Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.ACR open rheumatology · 2025Article
- Review
- Review
- State-of-the-Art Review: Vaccination in Pediatric Dermatology Patients Receiving Immunosuppressive or Immunomodulatory Therapy: A Review.Pediatric dermatologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is a heterogeneous group of diseases with probably differential underlying physiopathology. Despite the revolutionary era of biologics, some patients remain difficult to treat because of disease severity, drug adverse events, drug allergy or association with severe comorbidities, i.e., uveitis, interstitial lung disease and macrophagic activation syndrome. Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitors are small molecules that target JAK/Signal Transducers and Activators of Transcription (STAT) pathways, which could then prevent the activity of several proinflammatory cytokines. They may provide a useful alternative in these cases of JIA or in patients actually affected by Mendelian disorders mimicking JIA, such as type I interferonopathies with joint involvement, and might be the bridge for haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in these disabling conditions. As these treatments may have side effects that should not be ignored, ongoing and further controlled studies are still needed to provide data underlying long-term safety considerations in children and delineate subsets of JIA patients that will benefit from these promising treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.