Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37510799›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2023

Analgesic Modalities in Patients Undergoing Open Pancreatoduodenectomy-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Simona Mărgărit, Adrian Bartoș, Laura Laza, Cristiana Osoian, Robert Turac, Oszkar Bondar, Daniel-Corneliu Leucuța, Lidia Munteanu, Horațiu Nicolae Vasian

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Simona MărgăritDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, "Iuliu Hațieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-1684-8594
Adrian Bartoș"Prof. Dr. Octavian Fodor" Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Laura Laza"Prof. Dr. Octavian Fodor" Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Cristiana Osoian"Prof. Dr. Octavian Fodor" Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Robert Turac"Prof. Dr. Octavian Fodor" Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Oszkar Bondar"Prof. Dr. Octavian Fodor" Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Daniel-Corneliu LeucuțaDepartment of Medical Informatics and Biostatistics, "Iuliu Hațieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-4218-8622
Lidia Munteanu"Prof. Dr. Octavian Fodor" Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Horațiu Nicolae VasianDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, "Iuliu Hațieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy · ROInstitutul Regional de Gastroenterologie Prof. Dr. Octavian Fodor · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis systematic review explored the efficacy of different analgesic modalities and the impact on perioperative outcome in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy.

methodsA systematic literature search was performed on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library Database using the PRISMA framework. The primary outcome was pain scores on postoperative day one (POD1) and postoperative day two (POD2). The secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay (LOS) and specific procedure-related complications.

resultsFive randomized controlled trials and ten retrospective cohort studies were included in the systematic review. Studies compared epidural analgesia (EA), patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), continuous wound infiltration (CWI), continuous bilateral thoracic paravertebral infusion (CTPVI), intrathecal morphine (ITM), and sublingual sufentanil. The pain scores on POD1 (

conclusionsEA provided lower pain scores compared with PCA on the first postoperative day after pancreatoduodenectomy; the length of hospital stay and procedure-related complications were similar between EA and PCA. CWI and CTPVI provided similar pain relief to EA.

Indexed as

neuraxialopen pancreatoduodenectomyopioidspostoperative paintruncal blockwound infiltration

Identifiers

PMID37510799
PMCPMC10380756
OpenAlexW4384338525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.