Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37510669›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Culturally Informed Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Evaluations: A Scoping Review.

Kristina Vine, Tessa Benveniste, Shanthi Ramanathan, Jo Longman, Megan Williams, Alison Laycock, Veronica Matthews

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Evaluating the Tidda Talk Program: A Culturally Relevant Approach to Assessing Social and Emotional Wellbeing in Young Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Women.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kristina VineUniversity of Sydney, University Centre for Rural Health, Lismore, NSW 2480, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4427-0734
Tessa BenvenisteSchool of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, CQUniversity, Adelaide, SA 5034, Australia.
Shanthi RamanathanHunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, NSW 2305, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1374-5565
Jo LongmanUniversity of Sydney, University Centre for Rural Health, Lismore, NSW 2480, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8257-7772
Megan WilliamsSchool of Public Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia.
Alison LaycockUniversity of Sydney, University Centre for Rural Health, Lismore, NSW 2480, Australia.
Veronica MatthewsUniversity of Sydney, University Centre for Rural Health, Lismore, NSW 2480, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1319-257X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rigorous and effective evaluations inform policy and service delivery and create evidence of program impacts and outcomes for the communities they are designed to support. Genuine engagement of communities is a key feature of effective evaluation, building trust and enhancing relevancy for communities and providing meaningful outcomes and culturally relevant findings. This applies to Indigenous peoples' leadership and perspectives when undertaking evaluations on programs that involve Indigenous communities. This systematic scoping review sought to explore the characteristics of culturally informed evaluations and the extent of their application in Australia, including the use of specific evaluation tools and types of community engagement. Academic and grey literature were searched between 2003 and 2023, with 57 studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Over time, there was an increase in the number of culturally informed evaluations undertaken, predominantly in the health and wellbeing sector. Around a quarter used a tool specifically developed for Indigenous evaluations. Half of the publications included Indigenous authorship; however, most studies lacked detail on how evaluations engaged with communities. This review highlights the need for further development of evaluation tools and standardised reporting to allow for shared learnings and improvement in culturally safe evaluation practices for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities.

Indexed as

Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander PeoplesHealth Services, IndigenousAustraliaHumansAboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoplescommunity engagementcommunity ledculturally informedevaluation

Identifiers

PMID37510669
PMCPMC10379730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.