Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37510646›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Patients' Perspectives on the Use of a Newly Developed "Patients' Guide for Doctor's Visit": DocVISITguide.

Rebecca Jaks, Elena Guggiari, Saskia Maria De Gani, Dunja Nicca

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rebecca JaksCareum Center for Health Literacy, Careum Foundation, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4998-2792
Elena GuggiariCareum Center for Health Literacy, Careum Foundation, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-8656-9825
Saskia Maria De GaniCareum Center for Health Literacy, Careum Foundation, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7992-7209
Dunja NiccaEpidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, 8001 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4133-8177

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During doctor's visits, fundamental decisions regarding a patient's diagnosis and therapy are taken. However, consultations often take place within a limited time frame and are characterized by an asymmetric interaction. Therefore, patients' questions can remain unanswered and concerns unspoken. A "Patients' Guide for Doctor's Visit" (DocVISITguide) was developed to prepare patients for their visits, supporting them to take an active role in the communication and leave the consultation well-informed. This paper describes the development of the DocVISITguide and its first small-scale evaluation based on a sequential explanatory mixed methods design from the patients' perspective. For this purpose, a small sample of patients completed a pre- and post-questionnaire, and two in-depth interviews were conducted. Most participants found the DocVISITguide easy to understand. The guide helped them to take a closer look at their own health situation and be better prepared for the visit. More than three-quarters (82%) of the participants would probably use the guide again, and all (100%) would recommend it to family and friends. However, some patients felt unsure about using the guide within the consultation and showing it to their physician. To counteract this uncertainty, physicians should be actively involved in the use of such guides in the future.

Indexed as

Physician-Patient RelationsPhysiciansHumansReferral and ConsultationSurveys and QuestionnairesUncertaintydoctor-patient communicationevaluationhealthcarehealth informationhealth literacypatients

Identifiers

PMID37510646
PMCPMC10379287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.