Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37510590›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Patient Preferences for Long-Term Implant Care in Cochlear, Glaucoma and Cardiovascular Diseases.

Sabine Schulz, Laura Harzheim, Constanze Hübner, Mariya Lorke, Saskia Jünger, Annika Buchholz, Stefanie Frech, Melanie Steffens, Christiane Woopen

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Sabine SchulzCologne Center for Ethics, Rights, Economics, and Social Sciences of Health (CERES), University of Cologne and University Hospital of Cologne, Universitätsstraße 91, 50931 Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4817-7062
Laura HarzheimCologne Center for Ethics, Rights, Economics, and Social Sciences of Health (CERES), University of Cologne and University Hospital of Cologne, Universitätsstraße 91, 50931 Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9789-7023
Constanze HübnerCenter for Life Ethics, University of Bonn, 53113 Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0878-0681
Mariya LorkeFaculty of Engineering and Mathematics, University of Applied Sciences and Arts (HSBI), 33619 Bielefeld, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1201-427X
Saskia JüngerDepartment of Community Health, University of Applied Health Sciences Bochum, Gesundheitscampus 6-8, 44801 Bochum, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9545-8297
Annika BuchholzDepartment of Otolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
Stefanie FrechDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rostock University Medical Center, Doberaner Str. 140, 18057 Rostock, Germany.
Melanie SteffensDepartment of Otolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2266-2278
Christiane WoopenCenter for Life Ethics, University of Bonn, 53113 Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7148-6808
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEUniversity of Bonn · DEUniversity of Cologne · DEHochschule Bielefeld · DEHochschule für Gesundheit - University of Applied Sciences · DEUniversity of Rostock · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the process of developing and implementing innovative implant technologies the consideration of patient preferences can be beneficial for patients, doctors and developers. Nevertheless, in existing literature, there is still scarce knowledge of patients' perspectives on long-term implant care. In this study, three discrete choice experiments (DCEs) were conducted in the context of cochlear implants (CI,

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesPhysiciansChoice BehaviorHumansPatient Preferencecompatibilitydecision makingdurabilityimplant failureinformation needsreimplantationsustainabilitytechnological progresstreatment success

Identifiers

PMID37510590
PMCPMC10378795
OpenAlexW4384299546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.