Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37510584›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Integrated Long-Term Care 'Neighbourhoods' to Support Older Populations: Evolving Strategies in Japan and England.

Ala Szczepura, Harue Masaki, Deidre Wild, Toshio Nomura, Mark Collinson, Rosie Kneafsey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ala SzczepuraResearch Centre for Healthcare and Communities, Institute for Health & Wellbeing, Coventry University, Coventry CV1 5FB, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6244-9872
Harue MasakiGraduate School of Nursing, Chiba University, Chiba 263-8522, Japan.
Deidre WildResearch Centre for Healthcare and Communities, Institute for Health & Wellbeing, Coventry University, Coventry CV1 5FB, UK.
Toshio NomuraResearch Centre for Healthcare and Communities, Institute for Health & Wellbeing, Coventry University, Coventry CV1 5FB, UK.
Mark CollinsonMC2S Consultancy Services, Bromsgrove, Worcestershire B48 7JX, UK.
Rosie KneafseyResearch Centre for Healthcare and Communities, Institute for Health & Wellbeing, Coventry University, Coventry CV1 5FB, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Western countries are currently facing the public health challenge of a rapidly aging population and the associated challenge of providing long-term care services to meet its needs with a reduced working age population. As people age, they will increasingly require both health and social care services to maintain their quality of life and these will need to be integrated to provide cost-effective long-term care. The World Health Organization recommended in 2020 that all countries should have integrated long-term care strategies to better support their older populations. Japan, with the most rapidly ageing society in the world, started to address this challenge in the 1990s. In 2017, it introduced a national policy for integrated long-term health and social care services at a local geographical level for older people. England has recently embarked on its first plan aiming for the integration of services for older people. In this article, we compare these approaches to the integration of long-term care systems, including the strengths of each. The paper also considers the effects of historical, cultural and organizational factors and the emerging role of technology. Finally, we identify critical lessons that can inform strategy development in other countries, and highlight the need to provide more international comparisons.

Indexed as

Long-Term CareQuality of LifeAgedAgingHumansJapanPolicyaging in placecommunity-based careCOVID-19digital technologyfamily carersintegrated health and social careinternational comparisonJapannational strategyolder people

Identifiers

PMID37510584
PMCPMC10379849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.