Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37510559›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Respiratory Health Impacts of Outdoor Air Pollution and the Efficacy of Local Risk Communication in Quito, Ecuador.

Jiang Zhou, Laura Gladson, Valeria Díaz Suárez, Kevin Cromar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Risk communication, respiratory health risks, and air pollution forecasting in the city of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jiang ZhouMarron Institute of Urban Management, New York University, Brooklyn, NY 11201, USA.
Laura GladsonMarron Institute of Urban Management, New York University, Brooklyn, NY 11201, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0406-9684
Valeria Díaz SuárezSecretaría de Ambiente del Distrito Metropolitano de Quito, Quito 170138, Ecuador.
Kevin CromarMarron Institute of Urban Management, New York University, Brooklyn, NY 11201, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7745-2780
New York University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Relatively few studies on the adverse health impacts of outdoor air pollution have been conducted in Latin American cities, whose pollutant mixtures and baseline health risks are distinct from North America, Europe, and Asia. This study evaluates respiratory morbidity risk associated with ambient air pollution in Quito, Ecuador, and specifically evaluates if the local air quality index accurately reflects population-level health risks. Poisson generalized linear models using air pollution, meteorological, and hospital admission data from 2014 to 2015 were run to quantify the associations of air pollutants and index values with respiratory outcomes in single- and multi-pollutant models. Significant associations were observed for increased respiratory hospital admissions and ambient concentrations of fine particulate matter (PM

Indexed as

Air PollutantsAir PollutionOzoneCommunicationEcuadorHumansNitrogen DioxideParticulate MatterAir PollutantsNitrogen DioxideOzoneParticulate Matterair pollutionglobal healthhealth communicationLatin Americarespiratory tract diseases

Identifiers

PMID37510559
PMCPMC10379231
OpenAlexW4383695423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.