Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37510525›Full record

ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Systematic Review of Lung Cancer Screening: Advancements and Strategies for Implementation.

Daniela Amicizia, Maria Francesca Piazza, Francesca Marchini, Matteo Astengo, Federico Grammatico, Alberto Battaglini, Irene Schenone, Camilla Sticchi, Rosa Lavieri, Bruno Di Silverio and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
16.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. [Frontiers in medicine · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Tumor Lysis Syndrome in Lung Cancer Patients: A Review of the Literature.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniela AmiciziaRegional Health Agency of Liguria (ALiSa), 16121 Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9707-5214
Maria Francesca PiazzaRegional Health Agency of Liguria (ALiSa), 16121 Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2404-3609
Francesca MarchiniRegional Health Agency of Liguria (ALiSa), 16121 Genoa, Italy.
Matteo AstengoRegional Health Agency of Liguria (ALiSa), 16121 Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4683-1945
Federico GrammaticoRegional Health Agency of Liguria (ALiSa), 16121 Genoa, Italy.
Alberto BattagliniRegional Health Agency of Liguria (ALiSa), 16121 Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0593-0090
Irene SchenoneRegional Health Agency of Liguria (ALiSa), 16121 Genoa, Italy.
Camilla SticchiRegional Health Agency of Liguria (ALiSa), 16121 Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5499-9110
Rosa LavieriRegional Health Agency of Liguria (ALiSa), 16121 Genoa, Italy.
Bruno Di SilverioRegional Health Agency of Liguria (ALiSa), 16121 Genoa, Italy.
Giovanni Battista AndreoliRegional Health Agency of Liguria (ALiSa), 16121 Genoa, Italy.
Filippo AnsaldiRegional Health Agency of Liguria (ALiSa), 16121 Genoa, Italy.
Agenzia Regionale per la Protezione dell'ambiente ligure · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in Europe, with low survival rates primarily due to late-stage diagnosis. Early detection can significantly improve survival rates, but lung cancer screening is not currently implemented in Italy. Many countries have implemented lung cancer screening programs for high-risk populations, with studies showing a reduction in mortality. This review aimed to identify key areas for establishing a lung cancer screening program in Italy. A literature search was conducted in October 2022, using the PubMed and Scopus databases. Items of interest included updated evidence, approaches used in other countries, enrollment and eligibility criteria, models, cost-effectiveness studies, and smoking cessation programs. A literature search yielded 61 scientific papers, highlighting the effectiveness of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening in reducing mortality among high-risk populations. The National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) in the United States demonstrated a 20% reduction in lung cancer mortality with LDCT, and other trials confirmed its potential to reduce mortality by up to 39% and detect early-stage cancers. However, false-positive results and associated harm were concerns. Economic evaluations generally supported the cost-effectiveness of LDCT screening, especially when combined with smoking cessation interventions for individuals aged 55 to 75 with a significant smoking history. Implementing a screening program in Italy requires the careful consideration of optimal strategies, population selection, result management, and the integration of smoking cessation. Resource limitations and tailored interventions for subpopulations with low-risk perception and non-adherence rates should be addressed with multidisciplinary expertise.

Indexed as

cost-effectivenesshealthcarelow-dose computed tomography (LDCT)lung cancermortality reductionscreening program

Identifiers

PMID37510525
PMCPMC10379173
OpenAlexW4385212591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.