ArticleGenes2023
ERCC1 and MGMT Methylation as a Predictive Marker of Relapse and FOLFOX Response in Colorectal Cancer Patients from South Tunisia.
Article in Genes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Screening, Prognostic, and Predictive Molecular Tools for Colorectal Cancer: Recent Advances in the Classical Background.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Impact of MGMT methylation on overall survival in solid tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2026Article
- The Role of Epigenetic Biomarkers as Diagnostic, Predictive and Prognostic Factors in Colorectal Cancer.Cancers · 2025Review
- ERCC1/NGFR affects prognosis in basal-like breast cancer.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Recent advances on gene-related DNA methylation in cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment: a clinical perspective.Clinical epigenetics · 2025Review
- Research progress of DNA methylation in colorectal cancer (Review).Molecular medicine reports · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genetic and epigenetic modifications present a major cause of relapse and treatment failure in colorectal cancer. This study aims to appreciate the prognostic and predictive value of ERRC1 and MGMT methylation. We also studied the prognostic impact of the ERCC1 rs11615 polymorphism as well as its expression. Methylation profiles of ERCC1 and MGMT were tested by methylation-specific PCR. A polymorphism of ERCC1 was studied using PCR-RFLP and its expression was examined by immunohistochemistry. ERCC1 was methylated in 44.6% of colorectal adenocarcinoma while MGMT was methylated in 69% of cases. MGMT methylation was strongly associated with lymph node metastasis, lymph invasion, venous invasion, perineural invasion, distant metastasis and relapse. Patients with methylation of both genes were more likely to have a poor prognosis and display chemoresistance. IHC analysis revealed that ERCC1 staining was noted in 52.8% of colorectal adenocarcinoma and inversely related to distant metastasis and cancer recurrence. Kaplan Meier analysis revealed that the worst overall survival was significantly associated with ERCC1 and MGMT methylation while decreased ERCC1 expression and T/T genotype exhibited the best overall survival. The methylation of MGMT, alone or combined with ERCC1, is predictive for poor prognosis, short overall survival and chemotherapy response in colorectal cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.