ArticleGenes2023
PromGER: Promoter Prediction Based on Graph Embedding and Ensemble Learning for Eukaryotic Sequence.
Article in Genes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Protein Sequence Analysis landscape: A Systematic Review of Task Types, Databases, Datasets, Word Embeddings Methods, and Language Models.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2025Pooled it
- Transitioning from wet lab to artificial intelligence: a systematic review of AI predictors in CRISPR.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Advances in natural product discovery: strategies, technologies, and insights.Natural products and bioprospecting · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Based Approaches for AAV Vector Engineering.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- mRNA-LM: full-length integrated SLM for mRNA analysis.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- An enhanced BERT model with improved local feature extraction and long-range dependency capture in promoter prediction for hearing loss.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
- DNA sequence analysis landscape: a comprehensive review of DNA sequence analysis task types, databases, datasets, word embedding methods, and language models.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Promoters are DNA non-coding regions around the transcription start site and are responsible for regulating the gene transcription process. Due to their key role in gene function and transcriptional activity, the prediction of promoter sequences and their core elements accurately is a crucial research area in bioinformatics. At present, models based on machine learning and deep learning have been developed for promoter prediction. However, these models cannot mine the deeper biological information of promoter sequences and consider the complex relationship among promoter sequences. In this work, we propose a novel prediction model called PromGER to predict eukaryotic promoter sequences. For a promoter sequence, firstly, PromGER utilizes four types of feature-encoding methods to extract local information within promoter sequences. Secondly, according to the potential relationships among promoter sequences, the whole promoter sequences are constructed as a graph. Furthermore, three different scales of graph-embedding methods are applied for obtaining the global feature information more comprehensively in the graph. Finally, combining local features with global features of sequences, PromGER analyzes and predicts promoter sequences through a tree-based ensemble-learning framework. Compared with seven existing methods, PromGER improved the average specificity of 13%, accuracy of 10%, Matthew's correlation coefficient of 16%, precision of 4%, F1 score of 6%, and AUC of 9%. Specifically, this study interpreted the PromGER by the t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) method and SHAPley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) value analysis, which demonstrates the interpretability of the model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.