Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37510282›Full record

SynthesisGenes2023

Spinal Muscular Atrophy Treatment in Patients Identified by Newborn Screening-A Systematic Review.

Karolina Aragon-Gawinska, Charlotte Mouraux, Tamara Dangouloff, Laurent Servais

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Genes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The impact of threeFrontiers in neurology · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Parfitian Priority, Gene Therapy, and Disability.The Journal of medicine and philosophy · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Karolina Aragon-GawinskaDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland.
Charlotte MourauxNeuromuscular Reference Center, Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital Liège, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9569-9229
Tamara DangouloffNeuromuscular Reference Center, Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital Liège, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium.
Laurent ServaisNeuromuscular Reference Center, Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital Liège, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9270-4061

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn spinal muscular atrophy, clinical trial results indicated that disease-modifying treatments are highly effective when given prior to symptom onset, which has prompted newborn screening programs in growing number of countries. However, prognosis of those patients cannot be inferred from clinical trials conducted in presymptomatic individuals, as in some cases disease presents very early.

methodswe conducted a systematic review of articles published up to January 2023.

resultsAmong 35 patients with three

conclusionsevaluation of data from 18 publications indicates that the results of early treatment depend on the number of

Indexed as

Muscular Atrophy, SpinalNeonatal ScreeningHumansInfant, NewbornPrognosisTimegene therapynewborn screeningPCRspinal muscular atrophy

Identifiers

PMID37510282
PMCPMC10379202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.