ArticleGenes2023
Low-Pass Genome Sequencing-Based Detection of Paternity: Validation in Clinical Cytogenetics.
Article in Genes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Global Recommendations for the Use of Diagnostic Genomic Sequencing in the Prenatal Setting on Behalf of the ESHG and ISPD.Prenatal diagnosis · 2026Article
- A Prospective Evaluation of the Diagnostic Utility for Low-Coverage Genome Sequencing in Prenatal Samples: A Comparison With Chromosomal Microarray Analysis.Prenatal diagnosis · 2025Article
- Misattributed paternity discovery: A critique of medical organizations' recommendations.American journal of human genetics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Submission of a non-biological parent together with a proband for genetic diagnosis would cause a misattributed parentage (MP), possibly leading to misinterpretation of the pathogenicity of genomic variants. Therefore, a rapid and cost-effective paternity/maternity test is warranted before genetic testing. Although low-pass genome sequencing (GS) has been widely used for the clinical diagnosis of germline structural variants, it is limited in paternity/maternity tests due to the inadequate read coverage for genotyping. Herein, we developed rapid paternity/maternity testing based on low-pass GS with trio-based and duo-based analytical modes provided. The optimal read-depth was determined as 1-fold per case regardless of sequencing read lengths, modes, and library construction methods by using 10 trios with confirmed genetic relationships. In addition, low-pass GS with different library construction methods and 1-fold read-depths were performed for 120 prenatal trios prospectively collected, and 1 trio was identified as non-maternity, providing a rate of MP of 0.83% (1/120). All results were further confirmed via quantitative florescent PCR. Overall, we developed a rapid, cost-effective, and sequencing platform-neutral paternity/maternity test based on low-pass GS and demonstrated the feasibility of its clinical use in confirming the parentage for genetic diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.