ReviewGenes2023
Single-Cell Analysis in the
Review in Genes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Identification of KIFC3 as a Colorectal Cancer Biomarker and Its Regulatory Mechanism in the Immune Microenvironment Based on Integrated Analysis of Multi-Omics Databases.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Systematic revelation and meditation on the significance of long exons using representative eukaryotic genomes.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Article
- Molecular Mechanisms of Immunoinflammatory Infiltration and Ferroptosis in Arthritis Revealed by a Combination of Bioinformatics and Single-Cell Analysis.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Article
- Application of a novel numerical simulation to biochemical reaction systems.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer molecular profiling obtained with conventional bulk sequencing describes average alterations obtained from the entire cellular population analyzed. In the era of precision medicine, this approach is unable to track tumor heterogeneity and cannot be exploited to unravel the biological processes behind clonal evolution. In the last few years, functional single-cell
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.