Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37510182›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Deep Learning Convolutional Neural Network Reconstruction and Radial k-Space Acquisition MR Technique for Enhanced Detection of Retropatellar Cartilage Lesions of the Knee Joint.

Malwina Kaniewska, Eva Deininger-Czermak, Maelene Lohezic, Falko Ensle, Roman Guggenberger

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Malwina KaniewskaInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich (USZ), Raemistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7840-8415
Eva Deininger-CzermakInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich (USZ), Raemistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7539-6033
Maelene LohezicAdvanced Technology, Science and Technology Organization, GE HealthCare, 8152 Zurich, Switzerland.
Falko EnsleInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich (USZ), Raemistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1097-404X
Roman GuggenbergerInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich (USZ), Raemistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5903-2248
University of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess diagnostic performance of standard radial k-space (PROPELLER) MRI sequences and compare with accelerated acquisitions combined with a deep learning-based convolutional neural network (DL-CNN) reconstruction for evaluation of the knee joint.

methodsThirty-five patients undergoing MR imaging of the knee at 1.5 T were prospectively included. Two readers evaluated image quality and diagnostic confidence of standard and DL-CNN accelerated PROPELLER MR sequences using a four-point Likert scale. Pathological findings of bone, cartilage, cruciate and collateral ligaments, menisci, and joint space were analyzed. Inter-reader agreement (IRA) for image quality and diagnostic confidence was assessed using intraclass coefficients (ICC). Cohen's Kappa method was used for evaluation of IRA and consensus between sequences in assessing different structures. In addition, image quality was quantitatively evaluated by signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) measurements.

resultsMean acquisition time of standard vs. DL-CNN sequences was 10 min 3 s vs. 4 min 45 s. DL-CNN sequences showed significantly superior image quality and diagnostic confidence compared to standard MR sequences. There was moderate and good IRA for assessment of image quality in standard and DL-CNN sequences with ICC of 0.524 and 0.830, respectively. Pathological findings of the knee joint could be equally well detected in both sequences (κ-value of 0.8). Retropatellar cartilage could be significantly better assessed on DL-CNN sequences. SNR and CNR was significantly higher for DL-CNN sequences (both

conclusionsIn MR imaging of the knee, DL-CNN sequences showed significantly higher image quality and diagnostic confidence compared to standard PROPELLER sequences, while reducing acquisition time substantially. Both sequences perform comparably in the detection of knee-joint pathologies, while DL-CNN sequences are superior for evaluation of retropatellar cartilage lesions.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencekneeMRIPROPELLER technique

Identifiers

PMID37510182
PMCPMC10378433
OpenAlexW4385218282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.