Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37510174›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Artificial Intelligence in Neurosurgery: A State-of-the-Art Review from Past to Future.

Jonathan A Tangsrivimol, Ethan Schonfeld, Michael Zhang, Anand Veeravagu, Timothy R Smith, Roger Härtl, Michael T Lawton, Adham H El-Sherbini, Daniel M Prevedello, Benjamin S Glicksberg and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. The role of advocacy and policy in advancing global neurosurgery.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Jonathan A TangsrivimolDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok 10210, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-0142-3569
Ethan SchonfeldDepartment Biomedical Informatics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7633-0450
Michael ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7067-0689
Anand VeeravaguStanford Neurosurgical Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Timothy R SmithDepartment of Neurosurgery, Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center (CNOC), Mass General Brigham, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Roger HärtlWeill Cornell Medicine Brain and Spine Center, New York, NY 10022, USA.
Michael T LawtonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI), Phoenix, AZ 85013, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1887-3980
Adham H El-SherbiniFaculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9966-0599
Daniel M PrevedelloDepartment of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and Jame Cancer Institute, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Benjamin S GlicksbergHasso Plattner Institute for Digital Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4515-8090
Chayakrit KrittanawongCardiology Division, New York University Langone Health, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Stanford University · USThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · USBarrow Neurological Institute · USCornell University · USHarvard University · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USNYU Langone Health · USQueen's University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a significant surge in discussions surrounding artificial intelligence (AI), along with a corresponding increase in its practical applications in various facets of everyday life, including the medical industry. Notably, even in the highly specialized realm of neurosurgery, AI has been utilized for differential diagnosis, pre-operative evaluation, and improving surgical precision. Many of these applications have begun to mitigate risks of intraoperative and postoperative complications and post-operative care. This article aims to present an overview of the principal published papers on the significant themes of tumor, spine, epilepsy, and vascular issues, wherein AI has been applied to assess its potential applications within neurosurgery. The method involved identifying high-cited seminal papers using PubMed and Google Scholar, conducting a comprehensive review of various study types, and summarizing machine learning applications to enhance understanding among clinicians for future utilization. Recent studies demonstrate that machine learning (ML) holds significant potential in neuro-oncological care, spine surgery, epilepsy management, and other neurosurgical applications. ML techniques have proven effective in tumor identification, surgical outcomes prediction, seizure outcome prediction, aneurysm prediction, and more, highlighting its broad impact and potential in improving patient management and outcomes in neurosurgery. This review will encompass the current state of research, as well as predictions for the future of AI within neurosurgery.

Indexed as

artificial intelligence (AI)artificial Neural Networks (ANN)Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN)deep learning (DL)machine learning (ML)neurosurgeryRecurrent Neural Networks (RNN)

Identifiers

PMID37510174
PMCPMC10378231
OpenAlexW4385377333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.