ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Point-of-Care Ultrasound for the Evaluation and Management of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries: A Systematic Review.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multidimensional Quality Evaluation of Imaging Performance for Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Computed Tomography System.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injuries, though less common than other knee ligament injuries, pose significant management challenges. This study aimed to systematically review and analyze the current evidence on the use of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) for the evaluation and management of PCL injuries. It was hypothesized that POCUS has comparable diagnostic accuracy to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and that the use of POCUS improves patient outcomes and reduces healthcare costs. A comprehensive systematic review of articles published up to April 2023 was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Scopus databases and adhered to the PRISMA guidelines. Studies were selected based on relevance to the research question, with a focus on diagnostic accuracy, reliability, clinical utility, and cost-effectiveness of POCUS in PCL injuries. Seven studies, analyzing a total of 242 patients with PCL injuries, were included. The reported sensitivity and specificity of POCUS for diagnosing PCL injuries ranged from 83.3% to 100% and 86.7% to 100%, respectively, across the studies. In one study, POCUS demonstrated a positive predictive value (PPV) of 87.9% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 82.4%. Additionally, three studies reported 100% accuracy in PCL injury detection using POCUS, suggesting a substantial potential for cost savings by eliminating the need for MRI. This systematic review supports the use of POCUS in the evaluation and management of PCL injuries, suggesting that POCUS is a reliable, cost-effective tool with high diagnostic accuracy comparable to that of MRI, offering the potential to improve patient outcomes and reduce healthcare costs. The data collated in this review can inform clinical practice and guide future research in the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.