Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37510080›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Real-Life Diagnostic Performance of the Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis Guidelines: A Multicenter Cohort Study.

Ophir Freund, Yitzhac Hadad, Tamar Shalmon, Ori Wand, Sonia Schneer, Tal Moshe Perluk, Eyal Kleinhendler, Tzlil Hershko, Boaz Tiran, Galit Aviram and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Ophir FreundCenter of Excellence for Interstitial Lung Diseases, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo 6801298, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-7272-5284
Yitzhac HadadDepartment of Radiology, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo 6801298, Israel.
Tamar ShalmonDepartment of Radiology, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo 6801298, Israel.
Ori WandDivision of Pulmonary Medicine, Barzilai University Medical Center, Ashkelon 7830604, Israel.
Sonia SchneerPulmonary Division, Lady Davis Carmel Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, The Technion Institute of Technology, Haifa 3200003, Israel.
Tal Moshe PerlukInstitute of Pulmonary Medicine, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo 6801298, Israel.
Eyal KleinhendlerInstitute of Pulmonary Medicine, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo 6801298, Israel.
Tzlil HershkoCenter of Excellence for Interstitial Lung Diseases, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo 6801298, Israel.
Boaz TiranInstitute of Pulmonary Medicine, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo 6801298, Israel.
Galit AviramDepartment of Radiology, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo 6801298, Israel.
Evgeni GershmanInstitute of Pulmonary Medicine, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo 6801298, Israel.
Yochai AdirPulmonary Division, Lady Davis Carmel Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, The Technion Institute of Technology, Haifa 3200003, Israel.
David ShitritPulmonary Department, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba 4428164, Israel.
Amir Bar-ShaiInstitute of Pulmonary Medicine, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo 6801298, Israel.
Avraham UntermanCenter of Excellence for Interstitial Lung Diseases, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo 6801298, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-0965-3326

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) is a heterogeneous interstitial lung disease (ILD) that may be difficult to confidently diagnose. Recently, the 2020 ATS/JRS/ALAT HP diagnostic guidelines were published, yet data validating their performance in real-life settings are scarce. We aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of the HP guidelines compared to the gold-standard multidisciplinary discussion (MDD). For this purpose, we included consecutive ILD patients that underwent diagnostic bronchoscopy between 2017 and 2020 in three large medical centers. Four diagnostic factors (antigen exposure history, chest computed tomography pattern, bronchoalveolar lavage lymphocyte count, and histology results) were used to assign guidelines-based HP diagnostic confidence levels for each patient. A sensitivity analysis was performed, with MDD diagnosis as the reference standard. Overall, 213 ILD patients were included, 45 (21%) with an MDD diagnosis of HP. The guidelines' moderate (≥70%) confidence threshold produced optimal performance with 73% sensitivity for HP, 89% specificity, and a J-index of 0.62. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for a correct guidelines-based diagnosis was 0.86. The guidelines had better performance for non-fibrotic than fibrotic HP (AUC 0.92 vs. 0.82). All diagnostic factors, except bronchoalveolar lavage lymphocyte count, were independent predictors for MDD diagnosis of HP in a multivariate analysis. In conclusion, the HP guidelines exhibited a good diagnostic performance compared to MDD diagnosis in real-life setting.

Indexed as

accuracybronchoalveolar lavagediagnosishypersensitivity pneumonitisinterstitial lung disease

Identifiers

PMID37510080
PMCPMC10377863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.