Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37509897›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Techno-Functional and Sensory Characterization of Commercial Plant Protein Powders.

Kadi Jakobson, Aleksei Kaleda, Karl Adra, Mari-Liis Tammik, Helen Vaikma, Tiina Kriščiunaite, Raivo Vilu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Infrared drying characteristics of locust (Journal of food science and technology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Opportunities and challenges of plant proteins as functional ingredients for food production.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kadi JakobsonCenter of Food and Fermentation Technologies (TFTAK), Mäealuse 2/4B, 12618 Tallinn, Estonia.ORCID 0009-0006-8224-2514
Aleksei KaledaCenter of Food and Fermentation Technologies (TFTAK), Mäealuse 2/4B, 12618 Tallinn, Estonia.ORCID 0000-0001-9003-130X
Karl AdraCenter of Food and Fermentation Technologies (TFTAK), Mäealuse 2/4B, 12618 Tallinn, Estonia.
Mari-Liis TammikCenter of Food and Fermentation Technologies (TFTAK), Mäealuse 2/4B, 12618 Tallinn, Estonia.
Helen VaikmaCenter of Food and Fermentation Technologies (TFTAK), Mäealuse 2/4B, 12618 Tallinn, Estonia.ORCID 0000-0003-4156-733X
Tiina KriščiunaiteCenter of Food and Fermentation Technologies (TFTAK), Mäealuse 2/4B, 12618 Tallinn, Estonia.ORCID 0000-0003-4580-5921
Raivo ViluCenter of Food and Fermentation Technologies (TFTAK), Mäealuse 2/4B, 12618 Tallinn, Estonia.

Funding

Estonian Research Council ResTA16European Regional Development Fund 2014-2020.4.02.20-0270
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many new plant proteins are appearing on the market, but their properties are insufficiently characterized. Hence, we collected 24 commercial proteins from pea, oat, fava bean, chickpea, mung bean, potato, canola, soy, and wheat, including different batches, and assessed their techno-functional and sensory properties. Many powders had yellow, red, and brown color tones, but that of fava bean was the lightest. The native pH ranged from 6.0 to 7.7. The water solubility index was 28% on average, but after heat treatment the solubility typically increased. Soy isolate had by far the best water-holding capacity of 6.3 g (H

Indexed as

emulsificationfoamingfunctional propertiesgellingplant proteinssensory analysisvisco-thermal analysiswater-holding capacitywater solubility

Identifiers

PMID37509897
PMCPMC10379337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.