Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37509848›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Yeasts Inoculation Effect on Bacterial Development in Carbonic Maceration Wines Elaboration.

Ana Rosa Gutiérrez, Pilar Santamaría, Lucía González-Arenzana, Patrocinio Garijo, Carmen Olarte, Susana Sanz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ana Rosa GutiérrezICVV, Instituto de Ciencias de la Vid y el Vino (Universidad de La Rioja, Gobierno de La Rioja, CSIC), Finca La Grajera, Ctra. LO-20- salida 13, 26071 Logroño, Spain.
Pilar SantamaríaICVV, Instituto de Ciencias de la Vid y el Vino (Universidad de La Rioja, Gobierno de La Rioja, CSIC), Finca La Grajera, Ctra. LO-20- salida 13, 26071 Logroño, Spain.
Lucía González-ArenzanaICVV, Instituto de Ciencias de la Vid y el Vino (Universidad de La Rioja, Gobierno de La Rioja, CSIC), Finca La Grajera, Ctra. LO-20- salida 13, 26071 Logroño, Spain.
Patrocinio GarijoICVV, Instituto de Ciencias de la Vid y el Vino (Universidad de La Rioja, Gobierno de La Rioja, CSIC), Finca La Grajera, Ctra. LO-20- salida 13, 26071 Logroño, Spain.
Carmen OlarteDepartamento de Agricultura y Alimentación, Universidad de La Rioja, 26006 Logroño, Spain.
Susana SanzDepartamento de Agricultura y Alimentación, Universidad de La Rioja, 26006 Logroño, Spain.

Funding

Ministerio de Ciencias e Investigación Universitaria (MCIU). Spanish Goverment. Spain RTI2018-096051-R-C31/C33
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carbonic maceration (CM) vinification is a very traditional method that allows saving energy without great equipment investment, obtaining high-quality wines. However, due to its particularities, CM winemaking implies a higher risk of microbial alteration. This work studies the evolution of bacterial population along carbonic maceration wines elaboration with and without yeast inoculation. In the same way, two strategies of yeast inoculation were studied: "pied de cuve" and Active Dry Yeasts (ADY) seed. For this purpose, three conditions were assayed: spontaneous fermentation (without inoculation), "pied de cuve" technology, and ADY inoculation. For each condition, two winemaking methods were compared: carbonic maceration and the standard method of destemming and crushing (DC). The bacterial evolution (lactic acid and acetic acid bacteria) was followed in different fermentation stages. Finally, the wines obtained were analysed (pH and volatile acidity). In the non-inoculated wines produced by CM, high development of the bacterial population was observed (counts of acetic acid bacteria around 4.3 log cfu/mL), and finished wines presented high values of volatile acidity (>1.5 g/L), which did not occur in the inoculated vinifications (counts of acetic acid bacteria around 1.5 log cfu/mL and 0.5 g/l of volatile acidity). Thus, the control of yeast population, as a "pied de cuve" as ADY seed, seems to be an effective tool to avoid bacterial alterations in CM vinifications.

Indexed as

acetic bacteriacarbonic macerationlactic bacteriawineyeast inoculation

Identifiers

PMID37509848
PMCPMC10378745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.