Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37509631›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2023

Evaluation of Bioactive Glass Treatment for Dentin Hypersensitivity: A Systematic Review.

Dorotea Petrović, Dora Galić, Davor Seifert, Nikolina Lešić, Martina Smolić

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dorotea PetrovićDepartment of Dental Medicine, Faculty of Dental Medicine and Health, J.J. Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31 000 Osijek, Croatia.
Dora GalićFaculty of Dental Medicine and Health, J.J. Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31 000 Osijek, Croatia.
Davor SeifertDepartment of Dental Medicine, Faculty of Dental Medicine and Health, J.J. Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31 000 Osijek, Croatia.
Nikolina LešićDepartment of Dental Medicine, Faculty of Dental Medicine and Health, J.J. Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31 000 Osijek, Croatia.
Martina SmolićDepartment of Translational Medicine, Faculty of Dental Medicine and Health, J.J. Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31 000 Osijek, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-6867-826X

Funding

Croatian Ministry of Science and Education dedicated to multi-year institutional funding of sci-entific activity at the Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Dental Medicine and Health Osijek, Croatia IP7-FDMZ-2022 (to M.S.).
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this systematic review is to compare home and office desensitizers containing bioactive glass with control groups in randomized controlled trials (RCT) conducted between 2018 and 2022. According to PRISMA guidelines, three electronic databases (Scopus, PubMed, and Cochrane Library) were searched for published scientific articles in October 2022. RCT with adult participants with dentin hypersensitivity (DH) diagnosed by evaporative, mechanical, or thermal stimulation, with a follow-up period and quantified pain assessment were included in the study. Studies that reported DH due to tooth restoration, crown preparation, bleaching, or periodontal surgery or used bioactive glass-ceramics were excluded. The quality of the studies was assessed using version 2 of the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Tool for randomized studies (RoB 2 tool). Articles that were duplicative or unrelated to this study were excluded. Nine articles were selected for full-text evaluation, whereas two articles were rejected. The remaining seven reports were included in this review. The calcium sodium phosphosilicate group (CSPS) was not significantly different from the positive control groups. Compared with the control groups, fluoro calcium phosphosilicate (FCPS) may be the most effective long-term treatment option. In terms of DH symptom reduction, the FCPS group performed better than the CSPS group. CSPS at a concentration of 5-15% and FCPS at a concentration of 5% are effective in treating DH in adult participants.

Indexed as

bioactive glasscalcium sodium phosphosilicatedentin hypersensitivityfluoro calcium phosphosilicate

Identifiers

PMID37509631
PMCPMC10377612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.