ArticleBiomedicines2023
Building Predictive Models for Schizophrenia Diagnosis with Peripheral Inflammatory Biomarkers.
Article in Biomedicines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence-based diagnostic model for schizophrenia in individuals living with HIV.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Predicting antipsychotic responsiveness using a machine learning classifier trained on plasma levels of inflammatory markers in schizophrenia.Translational psychiatry · 2025Article
- Diagnosing schizophrenia with routine blood tests: a comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Biomarker signatures as predictors of future impulsivity in schizophrenia: a multi-center study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Enhancing infectious disease prediction model selection with multi-objective optimization: an empirical study.PeerJ. Computer science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Machine learning and artificial intelligence technologies are known to be a convenient tool for analyzing multi-domain data in precision psychiatry. In the case of schizophrenia, the most commonly used data sources for such purposes are neuroimaging, voice and language patterns, and mobile phone data. Data on peripheral markers can also be useful for building predictive models. Here, we have developed five predictive models for the binary classification of schizophrenia patients and healthy individuals. Data on serum concentrations of cytokines, chemokines, growth factors, and age were among 38 parameters used to build these models. The sample consisted of 217 schizophrenia patients and 90 healthy individuals. The models architecture was involved logistic regression, deep neural networks, decision trees, support vector machine, and k-nearest neighbors algorithms. It was shown that the algorithm based on a deep neural network (consisting of five layers) showed a slightly higher sensitivity (0.87 ± 0.04) and specificity (0.52 ± 0.06) than other algorithms. Combining all variables into a single classifier showed a cumulative effect that exceeded the effectiveness of individual variables, indicating the need to use multiple biomarkers to diagnose schizophrenia. Thus, the data obtained showed the promise of using data on peripheral biomarkers and machine learning methods for diagnosing schizophrenia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.