Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37509581›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2023

Biomechanics of Chondrocytes and Chondrons in Healthy Conditions and Osteoarthritis: A Review of the Mechanical Characterisations at the Microscale.

Sofia Pettenuzzo, Alessandro Arduino, Elisa Belluzzi, Assunta Pozzuoli, Chiara Giulia Fontanella, Pietro Ruggieri, Valentina Salomoni, Carmelo Majorana, Alice Berardo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. 1,25(OH)Clinical rheumatology · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sofia PettenuzzoDepartment of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, University of Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy.
Alessandro ArduinoDepartment of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, University of Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy.
Elisa BelluzziMusculoskeletal Pathology and Oncology Laboratory, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova (DiSCOG), Via Giustiniani 3, 35128 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1129-2574
Assunta PozzuoliMusculoskeletal Pathology and Oncology Laboratory, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova (DiSCOG), Via Giustiniani 3, 35128 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9905-0363
Chiara Giulia FontanellaDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3844-9842
Pietro RuggieriOrthopedics and Orthopedic Oncology, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova (DiSCOG), 35128 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9617-9882
Valentina SalomoniDepartment of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, University of Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8276-5565
Carmelo MajoranaDepartment of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, University of Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3871-0465
Alice BerardoDepartment of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, University of Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2346-0507

Funding

BIRD 2022 to E.B. DOR 2022PRIN 20177TTP3SPRIN 2017HFPKZYPRIN 20209F3A37
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomechanical studies are expanding across a variety of fields, from biomedicine to biomedical engineering. From the molecular to the system level, mechanical stimuli are crucial regulators of the development of organs and tissues, their growth and related processes such as remodelling, regeneration or disease. When dealing with cell mechanics, various experimental techniques have been developed to analyse the passive response of cells; however, cell variability and the extraction process, complex experimental procedures and different models and assumptions may affect the resulting mechanical properties. For these purposes, this review was aimed at collecting the available literature focused on experimental chondrocyte and chondron biomechanics with direct connection to their biochemical functions and activities, in order to point out important information regarding the planning of an experimental test or a comparison with the available results. In particular, this review highlighted (i) the most common experimental techniques used, (ii) the results and models adopted by different authors, (iii) a critical perspective on features that could affect the results and finally (iv) the quantification of structural and mechanical changes due to a degenerative pathology such as osteoarthritis.

Indexed as

biomechanical behaviourbiomechanicscartilagechondrocytechondronosteoarthritis

Identifiers

PMID37509581
PMCPMC10377681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.