ArticleBiomedicines2023
Validating Prediction Tools for Autoimmune Encephalitis in Adult Taiwanese Patients: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Biomedicines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rare Variants of Immune-Related Genes Increase Susceptibility to Autoimmune Encephalitis: An Association Study.Neurology international · 2025Article
- Autoimmune and paraneoplastic encephalitis-associated neuronal autoantibodies with serial EEG in adults with unexplained new-onset seizures or worsening epilepsy.Epilepsia open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Autoimmune encephalitis (AE) is a neurological emergency. We aimed to analyze the application and effectiveness of the currently available prediction tools for AE patients in Taiwan. We retrospectively collected 27 AE patients between January 2008 and December 2019. Antibody Prevalence in Epilepsy (APE) score, Response to Immunotherapy in Epilepsy (RITE) score, and anti-NMDAR Encephalitis One Year Functional Status (NEOS) score were applied to validate their usability. Based on the defined cutoff values, the sensitivity and specificity of each score were calculated. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the area under the curve (AUC) were generated for each scoring system. The AUC value of APE was 0.571. The AUC value of RITE was 0.550. The AUC values for the NEOS score at discharge and long-term follow-up were 0.645 and 0.796, respectively. The performance of APE and RITE scores was suboptimal in the Taiwanese cohort, probably due to the limitations of the small sample size and single ethnicity. On the other hand, the NEOS score performed better on long-term follow-up than at discharge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.