Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37509510›Full record

ArticleBiomedicines2023

Evaluation of Safety and Potency of Kyasanur Forest Disease (KFD) Vaccine Inactivated with Different Concentrations of Formalin and Comparative Evaluation of In Vitro and In Vivo Methods of Virus Titration in KFD Vaccine.

Ullas Gowda K Srikanth, Chandranaik B Marinaik, Amitha Reena Gomes, Doddamane Rathnamma, Sonnahallipura M Byregowda, Shrikrishna Isloor, Archana Munivenkatarayappa, Mudalagiri D Venkatesha, Suguna Rao, Apsana Rizwan and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedicines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Ocular Manifestations of Flavivirus Infections.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ullas Gowda K SrikanthInstitute of Animal Health and Veterinary Biologicals, Karnataka Veterinary, Animal and Fisheries Sciences University-KVAFSU, Bangalore 560 0624, India.
Chandranaik B MarinaikInstitute of Animal Health and Veterinary Biologicals, Karnataka Veterinary, Animal and Fisheries Sciences University-KVAFSU, Bangalore 560 0624, India.
Amitha Reena GomesInstitute of Animal Health and Veterinary Biologicals, Karnataka Veterinary, Animal and Fisheries Sciences University-KVAFSU, Bangalore 560 0624, India.ORCID 0009-0007-8487-6884
Doddamane RathnammaVeterinary College, Karnataka Veterinary, Animal and Fisheries Sciences University-KVAFSU, Bangalore 560 0624, India.
Sonnahallipura M ByregowdaInstitute of Animal Health and Veterinary Biologicals, Karnataka Veterinary, Animal and Fisheries Sciences University-KVAFSU, Bangalore 560 0624, India.
Shrikrishna IsloorVeterinary College, Karnataka Veterinary, Animal and Fisheries Sciences University-KVAFSU, Bangalore 560 0624, India.
Archana MunivenkatarayappaInstitute of Animal Health and Veterinary Biologicals, Karnataka Veterinary, Animal and Fisheries Sciences University-KVAFSU, Bangalore 560 0624, India.
Mudalagiri D VenkateshaInstitute of Animal Health and Veterinary Biologicals, Karnataka Veterinary, Animal and Fisheries Sciences University-KVAFSU, Bangalore 560 0624, India.
Suguna RaoVeterinary College, Karnataka Veterinary, Animal and Fisheries Sciences University-KVAFSU, Bangalore 560 0624, India.
Apsana RizwanInstitute of Animal Health and Veterinary Biologicals, Karnataka Veterinary, Animal and Fisheries Sciences University-KVAFSU, Bangalore 560 0624, India.
Raveendra HegdeInstitute of Animal Health and Veterinary Biologicals, Karnataka Veterinary, Animal and Fisheries Sciences University-KVAFSU, Bangalore 560 0624, India.
Karnataka Veterinary Animal and Fisheries Sciences University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We evaluated the safety and potency of the Kyasanur Forest disease (KFD) vaccine inactivated with different formalin concentrations in mice, since the side effects due to higher formalin concentrations have been a major reason for vaccine refusal. Furthermore, with an objective to reduce the use of mice in vaccine testing, we performed quantification of the KFD virus by real-time PCR and compared it with in vivo titration in mice. The KFD vaccine prepared in chicken embryo fibroblast cells was inactivated with 0.04%, 0.06%, and 0.08% concentrations of formalin. The vaccine inactivated with 0.04% and 0.06% formalin failed the safety test, whereas the KFD vaccine inactivated with 0.08% formalin was safe and potent with a log protective index of 5678 in mice. This reduced formalin content may induce no/lesser side-effects of pain/swelling which may increase the vaccine acceptance. The real-time PCR on individual KFD vaccine harvests interpreted that when the CT value of each harvest is <20, the vaccine will have sufficient viral particles to pass the potency test. Comparison of the real-time PCR on tenfold dilutions of the pooled harvests with in vivo mice inoculation test revealed that the 1MLD

Indexed as

formalinKFDKFD vaccinekyasanur forest diseasekyasanur forest disease virusreal-time PCR

Identifiers

PMID37509510
PMCPMC10377137
OpenAlexW4382753290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.