Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37509422›Full record

ArticleBiomedicines2023

An Improved Surgical Approach for Complete Interhemispheric Corpus Callosotomy Combined with Extended Frontoparietal Craniotomy in Mice.

Ilja Jelisejevs, Jolanta Upite, Shivan Kalnins, Baiba Jansone

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedicines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ilja JelisejevsDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Latvia, LV-1586 Riga, Latvia.
Jolanta UpiteDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Latvia, LV-1586 Riga, Latvia.
Shivan KalninsDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Latvia, LV-1586 Riga, Latvia.
Baiba JansoneDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Latvia, LV-1586 Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0002-4062-3363
University of Latvia · LV

Funding

ERA-NET Neuron consortium ES RTD/2018/29
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Callosotomy is an invasive method that is used to study the role of interhemispheric functional connectivity in the brain. This surgical approach is technically demanding to perform in small laboratory animals, such as rodents, due to several methodological challenges. To date, there exist two main approaches for transecting the corpus callosum (CC) in rodents: trephine hole(s) or unilateral craniotomy, which cause damage to the cerebral cortex or the injury of large vessels, and may lead to intracranial hemorrhage and animal death. This study presents an improved surgical approach for complete corpus callosotomy in mice using an interhemispheric approach combined with bilateral and extended craniotomy across the midline. This study demonstrated that bilateral and extended craniotomy provided the visual space required for hemisphere and sinus retraction, thus keeping large blood vessels and surrounding brain structures intact under the surgical microscope using standardized surgical instruments. We also emphasized the importance of good post-operative care leading to an increase in overall animal survival following experimentation. This optimized surgical approach avoids extracallosal tissue and medium- to large-sized cerebral blood vessel damage in mice, which can provide higher study reproducibility/validity among animals when revealing the role of the CC in various neurological pathologies.

Indexed as

corpus callosotomycraniotomyinterhemisphericmicesuperior sinus retraction

Identifiers

PMID37509422
PMCPMC10376606
OpenAlexW4381682734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.