ReviewCancers2023
Interpretation of Tumor Response Grade following Preoperative Therapy for Gastric Cancer: An Overview.
Review in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Can combined biochemical and radiological responses enhance prognostic assessment after neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced gastric cancer? A multicenter real-world study.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy in gastric cancer based on habitat imaging and peritumoral radiomics: a two-center study.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Pretreatment Claudin-18.2 Expression Predicts Poorer Survival Outcomes in Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer Treated with Perioperative Chemotherapy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A Radiomics-Clinical Nomogram for Pre-Treatment Prediction of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response in Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A Sensor-Oriented Multimodal Medical Data Acquisition and Modeling Framework for Tumor Grading and Treatment Response Analysis.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Neoadjuvant FLOT versus SOX chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer: secondary outcomes of a single-centre, open-label, randomised, exploratory phase 2 trial.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- A Multi-marker model based on serum IL-10 predicts response to conversion immunochemotherapy in gastric cancer patients: a retrospective cohort study.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Comparative Study of ERK1/2, Bcl2, and Sorcin with Clinicopathological Characteristics of Gastric carcinoma: Tubular Adenocarcinoma Vs Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2025Article
- Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Prediction of pathological response to neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy with baseline and post-treatmentBMC cancer · 2025Article
- Prevalence of CT-detected extramural vascular invasion in gastric adenocarcinoma and its correlation with other known prognostic factors.Japanese journal of radiology · 2025Article
- Deep learning nomogram for predicting neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in locally advanced gastric cancer patients.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2024Article
- Impact of dynamic changes of tumor marker in neoadjuvant chemotherapy-treated triple-negative gastric cancer patients: a multi-center study.BMC cancer · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- AI-Powered Insights into Drug Resistance in Gastric Cancer: A Path Toward Precision Therapy.Iranian journal of pharmaceutical research : IJPRReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gastric cancer is among the top five causes of cancer-related death worldwide. Preoperative chemotherapy has been established as an option in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. However, chemotherapy yields variable results, owing to the cellular and molecular heterogeneity of this disease. Identifying patients who did or did not respond to preoperative therapy can allow clinicians to alter treatment modalities and provide important information related to prognostication. A pathologic response to preoperative therapies, called the Tumor Response Grade (TRG), has been evaluated to quantify treatment response. Multiple systems for TRG have been established. However, the literature has demonstrated inconsistent results for TRG systems and prognosis, possibly due to variability in interpretation of tumor response between systems and interobserver variability. Radiographic responses to preoperative therapies using RECIST 1.1 criteria and endoscopically assessed tumor response have demonstrated association with survival; however, their use in gastric cancer remains challenging given the inability to accurately and consistently identify and measure the tumor, especially in the setting of neoadjuvant therapy, where treatment-related changes can obscure the gastric wall layers. While the response to preoperative therapies with positron emission tomography (PET) has shown promising results in esophageal and esophagogastric junction (EGJ) malignancies, its role in gastric cancer is still under investigation. This review is focused on summarizing the available literature related to evaluating TRG in gastric cancer, as well as providing a brief overview of the use of radiographic and endoscopic methods to assess response to preoperative therapies. Lastly, we outline future directions regarding the use of a universal TRG system to guide care and assist with prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.