ArticleBrain sciences2023
Subject-Independent EEG Classification of Motor Imagery Based on Dual-Branch Feature Fusion.
Article in Brain sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multi-Domain Feature Fusion and Channel Attention in an Inception-Based Architecture for Motor Imagery EEG Decoding.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- A Multiscale Decoding Approach of Subject-Independent Motor Imagery EEG Signal Combined with Data Alignment Strategy.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Cross-variability decoding for motor imagery EEG signals: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
- Transfer learning for subject-independent motor imagery EEG classification using convolutional relational networks.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- Compact convolutional transformer for subject-independent motor imagery EEG-based BCIs.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Enhancing EEG-Based MI-BCIs with Class-Specific and Subject-Specific Features Detected by Neural Manifold Analysis.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
A brain computer interface (BCI) system helps people with motor dysfunction interact with the external environment. With the advancement of technology, BCI systems have been applied in practice, but their practicability and usability are still greatly challenged. A large amount of calibration time is often required before BCI systems are used, which can consume the patient's energy and easily lead to anxiety. This paper proposes a novel motion-assisted method based on a novel dual-branch multiscale auto encoder network (MSAENet) to decode human brain motion imagery intentions, while introducing a central loss function to compensate for the shortcomings of traditional classifiers that only consider inter-class differences and ignore intra-class coupling. The effectiveness of the method is validated on three datasets, namely BCIIV2a, SMR-BCI and OpenBMI, to achieve zero calibration of the MI-BCI system. The results show that our proposed network displays good results on all three datasets. In the case of subject-independence, the MSAENet outperformed the other four comparison methods on the BCIIV2a and SMR-BCI datasets, while achieving F1_score values as high as 69.34% on the OpenBMI dataset. Our method maintains better classification accuracy with a small number of parameters and short prediction times, and the method achieves zero calibration of the MI-BCI system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.