Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37508940›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2023

Modality-Specific Perceptual Learning of Vocoded Auditory versus Lipread Speech: Different Effects of Prior Information.

Lynne E Bernstein, Edward T Auer, Silvio P Eberhardt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lynne E BernsteinSpeech, Language, and Hearing Sciences Department, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA.
Edward T AuerSpeech, Language, and Hearing Sciences Department, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA.
Silvio P EberhardtSpeech, Language, and Hearing Sciences Department, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA.

Funding

Speech Perception Training: Advanced Scoring and Feedback MethodsR44DC015418 · NIDCD · SEEHEAR, LLC · PI EBERHARDT, SILVIO P · 2019 to 2020
$1.0M
Multisensory Training for Unisensory Perceptual LearningR21DC014523 · NIDCD · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI AUER, EDWARD T, BERNSTEIN, LYNNE ESTHER · 2014 to 2014
$250k
NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC014523NIDCD NIH HHS R44 DC015418NIH HHS R21 DC014523, R44 DC015418
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditionally, speech perception training paradigms have not adequately taken into account the possibility that there may be modality-specific requirements for perceptual learning with auditory-only (AO) versus visual-only (VO) speech stimuli. The study reported here investigated the hypothesis that there are modality-specific differences in how prior information is used by normal-hearing participants during vocoded versus VO speech training. Two different experiments, one with vocoded AO speech (Experiment 1) and one with VO, lipread, speech (Experiment 2), investigated the effects of giving different types of

Indexed as

lipreadingmultisensoryperceptual learningspeech perceptionspeech perception trainingspoken language processingvocoded speechword learning

Identifiers

PMID37508940
PMCPMC10377548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.