ArticleBrain sciences2023
Subject-Independent EEG Emotion Recognition Based on Genetically Optimized Projection Dictionary Pair Learning.
Article in Brain sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Toward Robust EEG Classification Using Adaptive CNN-Transformer and Inception Architectures and Signal Level Augmentation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- On the prediction models for brain signal-based emotion recognition.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- EED-CL: Extended EEG Deformer with Contrastive Learning for Robust Emotion Recognition.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- EEG-Based Local-Global Dimensional Emotion Recognition Using Electrode Clusters, EEG Deformer, and Temporal Convolutional Network.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Objective Emotion Assessment Using a Triple Attention Network for an EEG-Based Brain-Computer Interface.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Optimizing Mental Stress Detection via Heart Rate Variability Feature Selection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Application of Graph-Theoretic Methods Using ERP Components and Wavelet Coherence on Emotional and Cognitive EEG Data.Brain sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One of the primary challenges in Electroencephalogram (EEG) emotion recognition lies in developing models that can effectively generalize to new unseen subjects, considering the significant variability in EEG signals across individuals. To address the issue of subject-specific features, a suitable approach is to employ projection dictionary learning, which enables the identification of emotion-relevant features across different subjects. To accomplish the objective of pattern representation and discrimination for subject-independent EEG emotion recognition, we utilized the fast and efficient projection dictionary pair learning (PDPL) technique. PDPL involves the joint use of a synthesis dictionary and an analysis dictionary to enhance the representation of features. Additionally, to optimize the parameters of PDPL, which depend on experience, we applied the genetic algorithm (GA) to obtain the optimal solution for the model. We validated the effectiveness of our algorithm using leave-one-subject-out cross validation on three EEG emotion databases: SEED, MPED, and GAMEEMO. Our approach outperformed traditional machine learning methods, achieving an average accuracy of 69.89% on the SEED database, 24.11% on the MPED database, 64.34% for the two-class GAMEEMO, and 49.01% for the four-class GAMEEMO. These results highlight the potential of subject-independent EEG emotion recognition algorithms in the development of intelligent systems capable of recognizing and responding to human emotions in real-world scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.