Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37508872›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Additive Manufacturing Using Agriculturally Derived Biowastes: A Systematic Literature Review.

Al Mazedur Rahman, Taieba Tuba Rahman, Zhijian Pei, Chukwuzubelu Okenwa Ufodike, Jaesung Lee, Alaa Elwany

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Al Mazedur RahmanDepartment of Industrial & Systems Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4301-8855
Taieba Tuba RahmanDepartment of Industrial & Systems Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Zhijian PeiDepartment of Industrial & Systems Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2280-4694
Chukwuzubelu Okenwa UfodikeDepartment of Engineering Technology and Industrial Distribution, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5718-0661
Jaesung LeeDepartment of Industrial & Systems Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7533-1865
Alaa ElwanyDepartment of Industrial & Systems Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.

Funding

National Science Foundation 2308575
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Agriculturally derived biowastes can be transformed into a diverse range of materials, including powders, fibers, and filaments, which can be used in additive manufacturing methods. This review study reports a study that analyzes the existing literature on the development of novel materials from agriculturally derived biowastes for additive manufacturing methods. A review was conducted of 57 selected publications since 2016 covering various agriculturally derived biowastes, different additive manufacturing methods, and potential large-scale applications of additive manufacturing using these materials. Wood, fish, and algal cultivation wastes were also included in the broader category of agriculturally derived biowastes. Further research and development are required to optimize the use of agriculturally derived biowastes for additive manufacturing, particularly with regard to material innovation, improving print quality and mechanical properties, as well as exploring large-scale industrial applications.

Indexed as

additive manufacturingagricultural wastesbinder jettingbiomassbiowastesFDMLDMselective laser sinteringstereolithography

Identifiers

PMID37508872
PMCPMC10376353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.