Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37508836›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2023

GIT-Net: An Ensemble Deep Learning-Based GI Tract Classification of Endoscopic Images.

Hemalatha Gunasekaran, Krishnamoorthi Ramalakshmi, Deepa Kanmani Swaminathan, Andrew J, Manuel Mazzara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Gastrointestinal tract disease detection via deep learning based structural and statistical features optimized hexa-classification model.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hemalatha GunasekaranInformation Technology, University of Technology and Applied Sciences, Ibri 516, Oman.ORCID 0000-0001-5768-6072
Krishnamoorthi RamalakshmiInformation Technology, Alliance College of Engineering and Design, Alliance University, Bengaluru 562106, India.ORCID 0000-0002-1679-5042
Deepa Kanmani SwaminathanInformation Technology, Sri Krishna College of Engineering and Technology, Coimbatore 641008, India.ORCID 0000-0001-8461-3792
Andrew JComputer Science and Engineering, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal 576104, India.ORCID 0000-0003-3592-6543
Manuel MazzaraInstitute of Software Development and Engineering, Innopolis University, 420500 Innopolis, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-3860-4948

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents an ensemble of pre-trained models for the accurate classification of endoscopic images associated with Gastrointestinal (GI) diseases and illnesses. In this paper, we propose a weighted average ensemble model called GIT-NET to classify GI-tract diseases. We evaluated the model on a KVASIR v2 dataset with eight classes. When individual models are used for classification, they are often prone to misclassification since they may not be able to learn the characteristics of all the classes adequately. This is due to the fact that each model may learn the characteristics of specific classes more efficiently than the other classes. We propose an ensemble model that leverages the predictions of three pre-trained models, DenseNet201, InceptionV3, and ResNet50 with accuracies of 94.54%, 88.38%, and 90.58%, respectively. The predictions of the base learners are combined using two methods: model averaging and weighted averaging. The performances of the models are evaluated, and the model averaging ensemble has an accuracy of 92.96% whereas the weighted average ensemble has an accuracy of 95.00%. The weighted average ensemble outperforms the model average ensemble and all individual models. The results from the evaluation demonstrate that utilizing an ensemble of base learners can successfully classify features that were incorrectly learned by individual base learners.

Indexed as

base learnersdeep learningensemble learninggastrointestinal tracttransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID37508836
PMCPMC10376874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.