ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Semantic Segmentation of Gastric Polyps in Endoscopic Images Based on Convolutional Neural Networks and an Integrated Evaluation Approach.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical outcomes of nursing interventions after endoscopic treatment for intestinal polyps and early-stage cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- Lightweight DeepLabv3+ for Semantic Food Segmentation.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Binary Classification of Laryngeal Images Utilising ResNet-50 CNN Architecture.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2025Article
- Cutting-Edge Machine Learning in Biomedical Image Analysis: Editorial forBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Enhanced gastric cancer classification and quantification interpretable framework using digital histopathology images.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- BFE-Net: bilateral fusion enhanced network for gastrointestinal polyp segmentation.Biomedical optics express · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have received increased attention in endoscopic images due to their outstanding advantages. Clinically, some gastric polyps are related to gastric cancer, and accurate identification and timely removal are critical. CNN-based semantic segmentation can delineate each polyp region precisely, which is beneficial to endoscopists in the diagnosis and treatment of gastric polyps. At present, just a few studies have used CNN to automatically diagnose gastric polyps, and studies on their semantic segmentation are lacking. Therefore, we contribute pioneering research on gastric polyp segmentation in endoscopic images based on CNN. Seven classical semantic segmentation models, including U-Net, UNet++, DeepLabv3, DeepLabv3+, Pyramid Attention Network (PAN), LinkNet, and Muti-scale Attention Net (MA-Net), with the encoders of ResNet50, MobineNetV2, or EfficientNet-B1, are constructed and compared based on the collected dataset. The integrated evaluation approach to ascertaining the optimal CNN model combining both subjective considerations and objective information is proposed since the selection from several CNN models is difficult in a complex problem with conflicting multiple criteria. UNet++ with the MobineNet v2 encoder obtains the best scores in the proposed integrated evaluation method and is selected to build the automated polyp-segmentation system. This study discovered that the semantic segmentation model has a high clinical value in the diagnosis of gastric polyps, and the integrated evaluation approach can provide an impartial and objective tool for the selection of numerous models. Our study can further advance the development of endoscopic gastrointestinal disease identification techniques, and the proposed evaluation technique has implications for mathematical model-based selection methods for clinical technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.