ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Optimal Feature Analysis for Identification Based on Intracranial Brain Signals with Machine Learning Algorithms.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- CBR-Net: A Multisensory Emotional Electroencephalography (EEG)-Based Personal Identification Model with Olfactory-Enhanced Video Stimulation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Biometrics, e.g., fingerprints, the iris, and the face, have been widely used to authenticate individuals. However, most biometrics are not cancellable, i.e., once these traditional biometrics are cloned or stolen, they cannot be replaced easily. Unlike traditional biometrics, brain biometrics are extremely difficult to clone or forge due to the natural randomness across different individuals, which makes them an ideal option for identity authentication. Most existing brain biometrics are based on an electroencephalogram (EEG), which typically demonstrates unstable performance due to the low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Thus, in this paper, we propose the use of intracortical brain signals, which have higher resolution and SNR, to realize the construction of a high-performance brain biometric. Significantly, this is the first study to investigate the features of intracortical brain signals for identification. Specifically, several features based on local field potential are computed for identification, and their performance is compared with different machine learning algorithms. The results show that frequency domain features and time-frequency domain features are excellent for intra-day and inter-day identification. Furthermore, the energy features perform best among all features with 98% intra-day and 93% inter-day identification accuracy, which demonstrates the great potential of intracraial brain signals to be biometrics. This paper may serve as a guidance for future intracranial brain researches and the development of more reliable and high-performance brain biometrics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.