Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37508800›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Design, Kinematics and Gait Analysis, of Prosthetic Knee Joints: A Systematic Review.

Faiza Rasheed, Suzanne Martin, Kwong Ming Tse

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Faiza RasheedDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Product Design Engineering, Swinburne University of Technology, 3122 Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6084-6014
Suzanne MartinInstitute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, 3011 Victoria, Australia.
Kwong Ming TseDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Product Design Engineering, Swinburne University of Technology, 3122 Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8170-0775
Swinburne University of Technology · AUVictoria University · AU

Funding

Higher Education Commission (HEC) Scholarship Grant, Pakistan HRD/OSS-III/2021/HEC/19641
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this review article is to appraise the design and functionality of above-knee prosthetic legs. So far, various transfemoral prosthetic legs are found to offer a stable gait to amputees but are limited to laboratories. The commercially available prosthetic legs are not reliable and comfortable enough to satisfy amputees. There is a dire need for creating a powered prosthetic knee joint that could address amputees' requirements. To pinpoint the gap in transfemoral prosthetic legs, prosthetic knee unit model designs, control frameworks, kinematics, and gait evaluations are concentrated. Ambulation exercises, ground-level walking, running, and slope walking are considered to help identify research gaps and areas where existing prostheses can be ameliorated. The results show that above-knee amputees can more effectively manage their issues with the aid of an active prosthesis, capable of reliable gait. To accomplish the necessary control, closed loop controllers and volitional control are integral parts. Future studies should consider designing a transfemoral electromechanical prosthesis based on electromyographic (EMG) signals to better predict the amputee's intent and control in accordance with that intent.

Indexed as

artificial knee unitgait analysisknee biomechanicsknee kinematicsknee prosthesisprosthetic knee jointtransfemoral amputee kineticstransfemoral leg amputation

Identifiers

PMID37508800
PMCPMC10376202
OpenAlexW4382403002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.